Search for: "Buckingham v. State"
Results 21 - 40
of 70
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Dec 2019, 6:56 am
Frac Serv. v. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 9:16 am
See Newcome Corp. v. [read post]
22 Oct 2019, 6:53 am
Nissan North America, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 5:25 am
Buckingham Tax Attorneys Steve Dimengo and Rich Fry recently obtained a favorable ruling from the 9th District Court of Appeals for their client in Karvo Paving Co. v. [read post]
6 Sep 2019, 8:53 am
In Environmental Quality Management Inc. v. [read post]
28 Aug 2019, 8:50 am
A Q&A guide to remote sellers’ exposure to sales and use tax in Ohio after the US Supreme Court’s decision in South Dakota v. [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 1:28 pm
Ohio’s economic nexus standard is the same as that at issue in South Dakota v. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 7:00 am
Most states have modeled their law after the South Dakota law analyzed in South Dakota v. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 9:12 am
In Greenscapes Home and Garden Products v. [read post]
18 Jan 2019, 5:51 am
See Seaton Corp. v. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 12:34 pm
In Great Lakes Bar Control v. [read post]
26 Dec 2018, 4:00 pm
Singapore: Singapore is a prosperous city-state in South-East Asia located just about 80 miles from the equator. [read post]
20 Jul 2018, 7:39 am
Steve Dimengo and Rich Fry are both partners with Buckingham’s Taxation Practice Group with a focus on State and Local Tax. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 1:41 pm
Dimengo, Buckingham, Doolittle & Burroughs, Akron, for Appellant Cincinnati Reds Kody R. [read post]
31 May 2018, 8:33 am
Steve Dimengo and Rich Fry are both partners with Buckingham‘s Taxation Practice Group with a focus on State and Local Tax. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 9:58 am
Is there any evidence that over the 12 years, during the flowering of the so-called surveillance state, Americans have become less politically active? [read post]
5 Jan 2018, 8:43 am
Buckingham Tax Attorneys, Steve Dimengo and Rich Fry, just obtained a victory from the Ohio Board of Tax Appeals (BTA) for their client in Karvo Paving Co. v. [read post]
30 Aug 2016, 7:55 pm
Menalis v. [read post]
26 Aug 2016, 7:26 pm
Cmwlth. 2000) (holding that claimant who quit to return to another state to care for his emotionally disturbed child was eligible for benefits); Miksic v. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 6:25 am
Lord Hodge relied on dicta from Fawcett Properties Ltd v Buckingham County Council [1961] AC 636, which held that a planning condition can only be void for uncertainty if it can be given no sensible or ascertainable meaning. [read post]
