Search for: "Buff v. State" Results 21 - 40 of 140
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jan 2019, 9:19 am
| The IP term (thus far) of the millennium: the curious story of the adoption of "patent troll" and "internet trolling" | No pain, no gain: Plausibility in Warner-Lambert v Actavis | Testing the boundaries of subjectivity: Infringement of Swiss-type claims in Warner-Lambert v Actavis | Is SPINNING generic? [read post]
13 Dec 2018, 5:04 am
Nope, none of these for IP-oriented tennis buffs. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 5:10 pm by Danielle Lewis
Code: the full United States Code with supplements 1925-1988.United States Reports: organized by volume, authoring justice, and major case topic, the digitized version of the official reports of the decisions for the Supreme Court includes all opinions in volumes 1-542, or years 1754-2004.Image from The Law Library of CongressFor History Buffs! [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 6:50 pm by Anthony Gaughan
The series is outstanding and will interest all history buffs. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 11:00 am by James E. Pfander
Rumsfeld (2004) (allowing detention of a U.S. citizen as an enemy combatant) and in Boumediene v. [read post]
6 Sep 2017, 4:52 am by Hon. Richard G. Kopf
I am taking about an object a history buff might use in his or her basement to reenact a battle during the civil war. [read post]
18 Aug 2017, 4:59 am by Jennifer González
– Illus. in: Frank Leslie’s illustrated newspaper, v. 57, 1884 Jan. 5, p. 309. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 4:58 pm by Jamie Baker
Friedman et. al., Advising Family Businesses in the Twenty-First Century: An Introduction to Stage 4 Planning Strategies, 65 BUFF. [read post]
8 Jun 2017, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
  Insight for privacy buffs: France J expressed doubt that ‘misappropriation of personality’ or ‘false-light privacy’ have a place in New Zealand’s tortious framework. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 7:43 am by Orin Kerr
I’ve become mildly obsessed with a Learned Hand opinion from 1928, Marsh v. [read post]
15 Jan 2017, 8:38 pm by Sandy Levinson
In theory, all that is required is a new state, but, of course, one cannot expect the beneficiaries of the single-member district process to get rid of it. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 11:03 am by Ronald Collins
” (This may have been the first sign of Ruth’s future role as one of the most active and precise questioners on the United States Supreme Court Bench.) [read post]
19 Oct 2016, 8:44 am by Jonathan Bailey
If you’re a copyright buff, you may find yourself seeking a good public domain film, of which I may have a few recommendations. [read post]