Search for: "Burford v. Burford"
Results 21 - 40
of 89
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jun 2015, 5:55 am
Detroit Memorial Park Association, Inc. v City of Detroit Board of Zoning Appeals, 2015 WL 2343879 (ED MI 5/14/2015)Filed under: Current Caselaw, Due Process, Takings [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 6:10 am
Posted by William Magnuson, Texas A&M Law School, on Wednesday, September 13, 2017 Tags: Algorithmic trading, Banks, Bitcoin, Crowdfunding, Dodd-Frank Act, Financial crisis, Financial institutions, Financial regulation, Financial reporting, Financial technology, Innovation, International governance, Market efficiency, Moral hazard, SIFIs, Systemic risk OCC Stakes Out a Lead Role in Establishing New… [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 4:09 pm
Defendants first moved that the Court abstain from exercising jurisdiction over this case under Burford v. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 1:24 pm
Raritan Baykeeper asks us to go a step further and hold that primary jurisdiction and Burford abstention never apply to RCRA and CWA actions. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 1:07 pm
And it may help judges prevent (or call into question) misrepresentations about David v. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 3:51 pm
" The district court declined to hear the case, dismissing the federal constitutional challenges to the two South Carolina statutes regulating video poker, on the ground that Burford v. [read post]
27 Aug 2015, 10:24 pm
Pulte Home Corporation v Montgomery County, Maryland, 2015 WL 4430588 (D. [read post]
2 Mar 2021, 7:12 am
Grace Ranch, LLC v. [read post]
2 Mar 2021, 7:12 am
Grace Ranch, LLC v. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 5:04 am
Sierra Club v. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 3:00 am
Finally, the plaintiffs argued that the court should decline to hear this putative class action under Burford v. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 4:15 pm
Burford v. [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 7:44 am
In Burwell, Secretary of Health and Human Services v. [read post]
13 Aug 2018, 3:26 am
” The decision does not mention Burford abstention or otherwise indicate if the defendants argued Burford abstention as an alternative basis for dismissal. [read post]
4 May 2011, 1:39 pm
" The dissenting Justice said, "I join the majority opinion on several issues, but I cannot agree with the majority's discussion and conclusion regarding abstention under Colorado River Water Conservation District v. [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 9:01 am
The seminal case Younger v. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 4:47 am
Two of my pet topics — dysfunctional buy-sell agreements and application of federal court abstention doctrine in private company disputes — intersect in a decision issued last month in Ray v Raj Bedi Revocable Trust, Case No. 3:19-CV-711 DRL-MGG [N.D. [read post]
15 Oct 2008, 7:32 pm
It says Burford v. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 3:23 am
In Friedman v. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 3:23 am
In Friedman v. [read post]
