Search for: "Burk v. Municipal Court" Results 21 - 40 of 44
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jul 2007, 10:56 am
Updating this ILB entry from July 17th, about the trial court ruling last week following the April 27th Supreme Court decision in the case of Naugle v. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 12:46 pm by Meg Martin
Burke concurring in part and dissenting in part: J. [read post]
17 Jul 2018, 9:30 pm by Sean Burke
Supreme Court decision in Abood v. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 1:20 pm by Meg Martin
Burke: The Justices wrote to address an issue raised by footnote 3 regarding whether failure to comply with the statute of limitations contained in § 1-39-114 deprived the court of jurisdiction. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 9:13 am by WSLL
Burke delivered the opinion for the court. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 11:20 am
The Court said that §80 of the Civil Service Law "reflects a legislative imperative" that the City was powerless to bargain away.As the Court of Appeals said in County of Chautauqua v. [read post]
18 Nov 2015, 2:54 pm by Kirk Jenkins
That’s the question the Illinois Supreme Court debated late in its September term, hearing oral argument in State of Illinois v. [read post]
15 Aug 2006, 1:26 am
COURTS International Organizations Law Review (Netherlands), Volume 3, Number 1, 2006 Wessel, Ramses A, Editorial: The UN, the EU and Jus Cogens Amerasinghe, C.F., The Conundrum of Recourse to Force To Protect Persons Raab, Dominic, The International Criminal Court and the Separation of Powers O'Connell, Mary Ellen, A Note on UN v. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 6:18 pm by John Elwood
  The Court appears to be holding United States v. [read post]
9 Jan 2010, 4:12 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Similar to Chelak's ruling in Jannone, Kwidis also stated, in dicta, that evidence of insurance may come into evidence at trial for limited purposes.Judge Thomas Burke of the Luzerne County Court of Common Pleas ruled in Glushefski v. [read post]
29 May 2024, 3:52 pm by Reference Staff
For scholarly publications, Rule 10.7.1(d) adds a descriptive parenthetical note for citing cases where an enslaved person was involved, and provides examples like “Wall v. [read post]