Search for: "Burns v Social Security Administration" Results 21 - 40 of 78
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jan 2025, 1:57 pm by Marty Lederman
 These risks to U.S. persons’ data have been a longstanding concern of Administrations of both [read post]
28 May 2019, 2:08 pm by Mark Walsh
Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit and holds that an appeals council’s dismissal of a Social Security claim on timeliness grounds when the claimant has had an administrative law hearing qualifies as a final decision “made after a hearing” so as to allow judicial review under the Social Security Act. [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 5:04 pm
Plaintiffs brought the present action against defendant-appellee Michael Leavitt, Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services ("defendant" or "the Secretary"), pursuant to Title XVIII of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 1:50 am by Rosalind English
 In any event, the secretary of state’s responsibility for the protection of national security was a central constitutional role, and encompassed a duty owed to the public at large. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Anyone involved in the disciplinary process or making a seniority determination in a layoff situation must consider these elements, as an employee’s rights to administrative due process and layoff rights, if any, depend on his or her actual, i.e., statutory, appointment status and the actual jurisdictional classification of the position to which he or she has been appointed. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Anyone involved in the disciplinary process or making a seniority determination in a layoff situation must consider these elements, as an employee’s rights to administrative due process and layoff rights, if any, depend on his or her actual, i.e., statutory, appointment status and the actual jurisdictional classification of the position to which he or she has been appointed. [read post]
22 Aug 2022, 5:56 am by Rachel Margolis
In a Feb. 9 ruling that prompted international condemnation, six of the defenders were found guilty of burning and damaging containers belonging to ILP, as well as detaining one of its security guards and setting fire to his truck. [read post]
16 Mar 2013, 3:24 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Her argument: administrative constitutionalism has slowly shifted the balance between national security and free speech. [read post]
23 Jun 2019, 4:25 pm by INFORRM
Internet and Social Media The Government has announced that legislation to place age restrictions on online pornography which was due to come into effect on 15 July 2019 now be delayed for up to 6 months after an administrative error. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 12:25 am by INFORRM
On 18 November 2015, the Administrative Court gave judgment in the case of HM Attorney-General v Conde Nast ([2015] EWHC 3322 (Admin)). [read post]
31 May 2024, 2:08 pm by Ben Sperry
” This is a major decision, and will have implications for free speech online, as the Court must soon consider similar facts in the social-media context in Murthy v. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 2:30 am by INFORRM
The owner of Rangers football club, Craig Whyte, is suing the BBC and Robert Burns, head of investigations at the Insolvency Service, for defamation. [read post]
13 Oct 2019, 7:20 pm by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
That year, the EEOC issued an extensive administrative ruling that reached three conclusions: first, sexual orientation discrimination is a form of gender stereotyping, which the Supreme Court held in Price Waterhouse v. [read post]