Search for: "Burns v. Woods" Results 21 - 40 of 155
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 May 2023, 1:52 am by David Pocklington
Consequently, in response to the question “They bury (and burn) altars, don’t they? [read post]
10 Jun 2016, 8:17 am by Sasha Volokh
Justice Houston in that case quoted it from Justice Jones in Lorence v. [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 7:51 am by Heather Donkers
He said he hid her body in the woods, but came back to move it a couple of times, and burned it in two different places. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 1:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Supreme Court has stated that the sufficiency of a claim of entitlement must be made by reference to appropriate State or local laws", citing Bishop v Wood, 426 US 341. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 1:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Supreme Court has stated that the sufficiency of a claim of entitlement must be made by reference to appropriate State or local laws", citing Bishop v Wood, 426 US 341. [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 7:51 am by Heather Donkers
He said he hid her body in the woods, but came back to move it a couple of times, and burned it in two different places. [read post]
28 Feb 2016, 5:00 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 21367 (ED CA, Feb. 19, 2016), a California federal magistrate judge recommended dismissing the complaint of a Wiccan inmate that he was not permitted to ceremonially burn wood in a fire pit.In Cary v. [read post]
1 Mar 2009, 6:14 am
It is burning the dead or trimmed mature trees, meaning the fuel source will not absorb the carbon released in equal portions. [read post]
11 Feb 2013, 9:36 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Ceballos (2006).It all started when Looney spoke to a town resident about the public health implications of wood burning and smoke discharge. [read post]
9 Dec 2016, 2:45 pm
Under this logic, if Alabama announced it planned to execute people by burning them at the stake and didn’t provide for another method, no death row inmate could ever get into court to challenge the stake burning. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 4:00 am
Reg. 359/09 (Renewable Energy Approvals under Part V.0.1 of the Environmental Protection Act. [read post]
21 Aug 2011, 11:10 am by Mark S. Humphreys
Farm Bureau initially refused coverage based on a wood-burning stove having inadequate protection. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 7:02 am by Michael Connell
While the hauling of construction debris for disposal (as alleged by the neighbour) is an activity regulated by Part V of the EPA, the Court of Appeal does not evaluate whether the MOE officer had a “reasonable belief” that the defendant was hauling construction debris (in fact, the defendant told the MOE officer he was burning wood from a barn he demolished on his own property (para. 12)). [read post]