Search for: "Burton v. State Appeal Board" Results 21 - 36 of 36
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jun 2019, 11:18 am by Burton A. Padove
In this case, the Indiana Court of Appeals upheld a ruling that opined the discretionary planning function immunity applied, which as noted in the 1988 Indiana Supreme Court case of Peavler v. [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 8:29 pm
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, September 10, 2008 US v. [read post]
7 May 2018, 1:51 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Relies on member states; referrals go through national authorities. [read post]
18 Oct 2006, 5:26 pm
On Sept. 29, 2006, the Board issued its decisions in Oakwood Healthcare, Croft Metals, and Golden Crest, in light of the Supreme Court's decision in NLRB v. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 8:03 am by stevemehta
To avoid interest and penalties, the plaintiff paid the full amount under protest and appealed to HHS’s initial review board. [read post]
2 May 2011, 6:58 am by Moria Miller
”DiPompeo ran the Law Review successfully, including publishing a comment, "Federal Hate Crime Laws and United States v. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 7:54 am by Sasha Volokh
Accounting Oversight Board, 561 U.S. 477, 496–97 (2010) (quoting Clinton v. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
The review examines the overall state of the domestic news market, its financial sustainability, the role of digital advertising and social media. [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 12:30 am by David Pocklington
In reviewing the legal principles which apply in disposal cases, it stated: “[51]. [read post]
31 May 2022, 6:43 am by familoo
There the 3 appeal court judges issued concurring judgments, best summed up for our purposes in this extract from the judgment of Sir Stanley Burton, who said :   ‘Parties to a matrimonial dispute who bring before the Court the facts and documents relating to their financial affairs may in general be assured that the confidentiality of that information will be respected. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 5:48 pm by admin
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held in State of Connecticut v. [read post]