Search for: "Bush v. International Alliance"
Results 21 - 40
of 54
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Nov 2015, 9:39 am
Most law professors emphasize the case method and the internal logic (or illogic) of judicial decisions. [read post]
14 Nov 2015, 10:23 am
Second, if NATO invokes Article V of the North Atlantic Treaty, it would trigger an international law obligation on the United States to “assist” France by taking “such action as [the United States] deems necessary, including the use of armed force, to restore and maintain the security of the North Atlantic area. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 2:43 pm
Common engagements include internal and external workforce hiri [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 11:24 am
Over at Defense One, Molly O’Toole charts President Obama’s stunning reversal on Bush’s laws of war. [read post]
10 May 2014, 6:55 am
And in my last week as the lawfare intern, I attended oral arguments in Ralls Corporation v. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 6:00 am
"Consider this: The 1954 Brown v. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 2:10 pm
Supreme Court case about the presidential war power, Youngstown Sheet & Tube v. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 8:20 pm
international relations. [read post]
24 Sep 2011, 6:34 pm
App. 6a (internal quotation marks omitted). [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 7:23 am
International Justice, Wild West v. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 9:30 am
Circuit ruled in Al-Bihani v. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 6:27 pm
Mass., et al. v. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 7:59 pm
Brown and David Matusow, Bahr, et al. v. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 10:47 pm
– Environmental Protection Agency, Federal Register, March 12, 2010 In accordance with section 113(g) of the Clean Air Act, as amended (‘‘Act’’), 42 U.S.C. 7413(g), notice is hereby given of a proposed settlement agreement and consent decree, to address a lawsuit filed by Wildearth Guardians: Wildearth Guardians v. [read post]
31 Oct 2009, 4:06 pm
— EPA News Release, October 26, 2009 Cytec Industries, an international chemical company based in Wallingford, Conn., will pay a civil penalty of $155,000 and spend $150,000 to perform an environmentally beneficial project to resolve EPA claims that the company violated the federal Clean Air Act. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 5:48 pm
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held in State of Connecticut v. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 5:19 pm
v. [read post]
24 Oct 2008, 11:39 am
Smartly, Eisenhower maintained the New Deal policies and supported civil rights, including the 1954 Supreme Court decision Brown v. [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 2:18 am
Salmon Spawning & Recovery Alliance v. [read post]
16 Aug 2008, 2:43 am
– discussion of Washington Post article on Ismed’s efforts to promote follow-on biologics approval pathway: (Patent Baristas), (Patent Docs), US: Congressional fact-finding on follow-on biologics: (Patent Docs), US: David v Monsanto: Biotechnology patent ‘exhaustion’ after Quanta, Supreme Court petition: (Hal Wegner), US: Ulysses Pharmaceuticals announces issuance of patent for novel class of ant [read post]
