Search for: "Butterworth v. Butterworth"
Results 21 - 40
of 102
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Mar 2011, 5:04 am
” Butterworth concurred. [read post]
14 Aug 2024, 12:58 pm
The third case that Sandoval relies on is Butterworth v. [read post]
23 May 2009, 11:28 am
V. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 7:46 am
(See also McLachlin and Taylor, in British Columbia Practice, 2d ed. looseleaf (Butterworths, 1991) pages 24-1 to 24-2-10, and the decision of this Court in Chavez v. [read post]
22 May 2016, 7:02 pm
Butterworth v. [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 11:29 am
In Zipher Ltd v Markem Systems Ltd and another [2008] EWHC 2078 (Pat), not yet available on BAILII but noted with extreme brevity by LexisNexis Butterworth's subscription service, Mr Justice Floyd has returned to an issue that is mentioned in his earlier decision in June -- the necessity (or otherwise) of Markem being given injunctive relief in respect of an undertaking which, Zipher had argued, was not really an undertaking not to amend one of its patents but a mere… [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 10:05 am
The Butterworths Intellectual Property Law Handbook (11th edition) has just been published by LexisNexis. [read post]
29 Jul 2008, 4:35 pm
Everything you ever need to know about the IJLIT here.In stark contrast to IJLIT's blinding white is the gleaming black of Butterworths' Intellectual Property & Technology Cases law reports. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 2:07 am
At 9.30am, in the case of The Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis & anr v Times Newspapers and at 10.00am in the case of Aspion v Daniel. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 11:58 am
Wallace v. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 4:06 am
The well-known and much used defence arises from the 1999 case of Reynolds v Times Newspapers in which the House of Lords (now the Supreme Court) extended the defence of qualified privilege to cover the media. [read post]
10 Dec 2008, 6:07 pm
The IPKat is bursting to read this in full on BAILII, since this posting-- based on a LexisNexis Butterworth note -- has stimulated his appetite to know more. [read post]
26 Nov 2024, 6:03 am
" Butterworth v. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 5:06 am
The 15th episode of Cautious v IPOff, chronicled weekly by the PatLit weblog, can be perused here. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 8:01 am
About 6 degrees off-beam should be okay (see Catnic Components Ltd v Hill & Smith, here). [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 5:02 am
A recent Appeals Court case, Wess v. [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 9:13 am
Judgment in Khader v Aziz, was given on 23 June 2010. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 4:00 am
See Montgomery v. [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 12:25 am
Update 3/8/10: Siobhain Butterworth in the Guardian: “And so we return to the Press Association’s quest to persuade the court of protection to allow the media to name the local authority rebuked in G v E. [read post]
15 Jan 2023, 10:18 pm
The second ground, that Australia is an inappropriate forum, turns on application of the ‘clearly inappropriate forum’ test of the Australian forum non conveniens doctrine: Chandrasekaran v Navaratnem [2022] NSWSC 346, [5]–[8]; Sapphire Group Pty Ltd v Luxotico HK Ltd [2021] NSWSC 589, [77]–[80]; Studorp Ltd v Robinson [2012] NSWCA 382, [5], [62]. [read post]
