Search for: "Buxton v. Buxton" Results 21 - 40 of 74
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Mar 2015, 1:53 am by INFORRM
After conducting a survey of the classifications used in the authorities including Campbell v MGN [2004] AC 457, Douglas v Hello! [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 7:41 am by Jani
One can easily agree with Lord Justice Buxton, and as he further states, 'use' should entail a more active component than just passively placing in in a sphere where it is easily accessed from, even by accident. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 3:09 pm by Giles Peaker
Ms T argued that Birmingham City Council v Ali [2009] UKHL 36 supported this argument. [read post]
1 Sep 2013, 9:49 pm by Simon Gibbs
Murray Heining, Chairman of the Association of Costs Lawyers, recently commented on this issue and repeated the comments of Dyson LJ (as he then was) in Buxton v Mills-Owens [2010] 1 WLR 1997: “[the solicitors] were under a professional duty not to include in the court documents that they drafted any contention which they did not consider to be properly arguable and not to instruct counsel to advance contentions which they did not consider to be properly arguable. [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
His decision was upheld on appeal with both Buxton LJ and Longmore LJ paying tribute to his ‘careful and correct’ judgment and his handling of the case. [read post]
18 Oct 2012, 1:15 am by war
Paul’s Retail Pty Ltd v Lonsdale Australia Limited [2012] FCAFC 130 Société Anonyme des Manujactures de Glaces v. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 5:03 pm by INFORRM
More recently, in Ferdinand v MGN Limited [2011] EWHC 2454 (QB) Nicol J said that a substantial body of the public would consider that the England football captain fell within Buxton LJ’s list of “those from whom higher standards were expected”. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 2:31 am by tekEditor
  To put it in perspective, my group at the University of Toronto was working on multi-touchin 1984 (Lee, Buxton & Smith, 1985), the same year that the first Macintosh computer was released, and we were not the first. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 3:00 am
This issue may also arise in connection with an employee's former employer supplying information to a prospective employer of the individual in response to a request for "references" (see Buxton v Plant City, 57 LW 2649). [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 9:43 am by INFORRM
Permission to appeal had been refused on paper by Sir Richard Buxton on 6 March 2012 but granted by Moore-Bick LJ at an oral hearing on 26 March 2012. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 10:50 am by Kevin
The following excerpts are from R. v. [read post]