Search for: "C Hartley "
Results 21 - 40
of 111
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Sep 2007, 10:03 am
Hartley Jr. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 2:10 pm
• Blake Cassels & Graydon LLP — William C. [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 7:05 am
Trevor C. [read post]
6 Apr 2016, 12:56 pm
L’auteur aimerait remercie Camille Hartley, étudiante à nos bureaux de Montréal, pour son aide avec cet article. [read post]
27 Aug 2013, 10:04 am
Choper, John C. [read post]
16 Jun 2021, 4:41 am
” Hartley v. [read post]
15 May 2017, 1:00 am
Hartley & Ors v King Edward VI College, heard 1 February 2017. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 1:00 am
This case considered whether the Court of Appeal was correct to hold that the appellants’ arrests and detention were lawful under ECHR, art 5(1)(c) or alternatively under art 5(1)(b). [read post]
18 Sep 2013, 11:37 am
by: Adam C. [read post]
22 May 2017, 1:00 am
Hartley & Ors v King Edward VI College, heard 1 February 2017. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 5:38 am
But that wouldn't cause staff to magically appear in Kenedy or Hartley Counties, for example. [read post]
5 Mar 2007, 9:59 am
Hartley v. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 7:01 am
Trevor C. [read post]
22 May 2012, 2:19 am
(Michigan), University of Göttingen The Common Law and EU Private International Law, Trevor C Hartley, London Die Rechtswahl und ihre Grenzen unter der Rom I-VO, Prof. [read post]
16 Jun 2018, 12:25 pm
The Court of Justice, of course, did not follow the Advocate General and, instead, reaffirmed its decision in West Tankers in Case C-536/13 Gazprom. [read post]
2 May 2017, 1:00 am
Hartley & Ors v King Edward VI College, heard 1 February 2017. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 1:00 am
Hartley & Ors v King Edward VI College, heard 1 February 2017. [read post]
11 Oct 2018, 10:10 am
”); Francisco Garcimartín (“Brussels I instruments: past, present and… future”); Trevor C. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 1:26 am
Pohl, IPRax 2013, 110; Hartley, ICLQ 2014, 861). [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 9:00 pm
Consistently with its reasoning in Gasser (Case C-116/02) and Turner v Grovit (Case C-259/02), the Court held in West Tankers that “even though proceedings [to enforce an arbitration agreement via an anti-suit injunction] do not come within the scope of [the Brussels I Regulation], they may nevertheless have consequences which undermine its effectiveness”, if they “prevent a court of another Member State from exercising the jurisdiction conferred on it by [the… [read post]
