Search for: "C Janues"
Results 21 - 40
of 128
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jul 2020, 4:32 pm
The violent incompatibility between the Facebook’s own policies results in a Janus-faced company, simultaneously interested in protecting rights, yet allowing for the rapid growth of content and engagement that undermines rights. [read post]
2 Apr 2020, 6:30 am
Janus v. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 1:54 pm
This decision opens a window for potential liability for misstatements beyond the Supreme Court’s prior decision in Janus Capital Group, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Dec 2019, 8:19 am
We're talking about the Roman god Janus. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 6:08 am
Ct. 1094 (2019), in which the Court held that those who disseminate false or misleading statements with the intent to defraud—even if they are not the “maker” of the statement—can be found to have violated subsections (a) and (c) of Rule 10b-5 of the federal securities laws, often referred to as the “scheme liability” subsections of Rule 10b-5. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 7:30 am
Janus entitled? [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 12:00 pm
Notwithstanding the Supreme Court’s pernicious holding in Janus that “fair share” agreements in the public sector are unconstitutional,(8) teachers have demonstrated and engaged in walkouts in numerous so called “red” states like West Virginia, Oklahoma, Arizona, and others similarly situated. [read post]
23 Aug 2019, 8:54 am
" … [C.] [read post]
1 Aug 2019, 7:00 am
” (Matthew C. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 9:05 pm
Other courts held that a claim under subparts (a) or (c) of Rule 10b-5 could not circumvent Janus and must be based on conduct beyond misrepresentations or omissions actionable under Rule 10b-5(b). [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 6:30 am
Appearances to the contrary are misleading.Philip C. [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 4:02 am
Janus v. [read post]
3 May 2019, 7:21 am
The following is a series of questions prompted by the publication of Lee C. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 2:48 pm
In Janus v. [read post]
14 Apr 2019, 7:04 am
SEC holding that an individual who is not a “maker” of a misstatement under Janus v. [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 1:01 am
In his dissent, however, Justice James C. [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 6:59 pm
” In a vigorous dissent, Justice Thomas (joined by Justice Gorsuch)), argued that the majority decision “eviscerates” the Janus distinction between primary and secondary liability. [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 10:29 am
Mar. 27, 2019), the Supreme Court of the United States (Breyer, J.) held that an individual who did not “make” a false or misleading statement within the meaning of Janus Capital Group, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Mar 2019, 3:00 am
As Broc subsequently blogged, the SEC responded to Janus by emphasizing its view that 10b-5(a) & (c) had a more expansive reach. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 2:45 pm
In balancing these two “Janus-faced” goals, ANILCA enables the Park Service “to protect—if need be, through expansive regulation—‘the national interest in the scenic, natural, cultural and environmental values on the public lands in Alaska. [read post]
