Search for: "C v. B" Results 21 - 40 of 22,650
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jan 2009, 8:15 am
The recent Court of Appeal decision in C v W [2008] EWCA Civ 1459 was concerned with a CFA with a success fee that was entered into after liability had been admitted by the Defendant's insurers. [read post]
16 Aug 2020, 9:41 pm by Patent Docs
Background This appeal arises from an inter partes review ("IPR") proceeding in which C&D Zodiac, Inc. [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 5:15 am by Peter Reap
The determinations of the Board were all supported by substantial evidence (B/E Aerospace, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Feb 2008, 1:43 am
Mayr v Bäckerei und Konditorei Gerhard Flöckner OHG (Case C-506/06): WLR (D) 63 “An employee who was dismissed at a time between the in vitro fertilisation of her ova and the transfer of the fertilised ova to her uterus was not "pregnant" for the purposes of Directive 92/85 on the safety and health at work of pregnant workers, but her dismissal was unlawful under Directive 76/207 on equal treatment… [read post]
19 Feb 2007, 6:42 am
On February 15th, Advocate General Bot delivered his Opinion in Case C-386/05 (Color Drack GmbH v LEXX International Vertriebs GmbH). [read post]
20 Oct 2006, 9:43 am
Accordingly, the Court held that appellate review of sentences imposed for Class B and C misdemeanors must be conducted under the pre-Guidelines standard applicable to those offenses, rather than the reasonableness test set forth in Booker. [read post]
3 May 2007, 5:15 am
Today, the European Court of Justice pronounced its judgment in Case C-386/05 (Color Drack GmbH v LEXX International Vertriebs GmbH). [read post]
15 May 2018, 7:20 pm by Howard Bashman
Eleventh Circuit grants rehearing en banc to consider whether “the risk of force clause in 18 U.S.C. sec. 924(c)(3)(B) is unconstitutionally vague in light of Sessions v. [read post]
17 Oct 2017, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
This year the Supreme Court Historical Society’s Frank C. [read post]
4 May 2012, 3:16 am by tracey
O(B) v Director of the Serious Fraud Office: [2012] EWCA Crim 901;  [2012] WLR (D)  133 “In contempt of court cases, there was a right of appeal to the Supreme Court from the Court of Appeal, Criminal Division, by the route of rectification of section 378 and paragraph 45(2) of Schedule 16 to the Armed Forces Act 2006 which had deleted the reference to the Court of Appeal, Criminal Division and inserted no new reference. [read post]