Search for: "C. COAKLEY"
Results 21 - 40
of 54
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Sep 2011, 10:31 am
Coakley has not responded to my requests for information and for comment on my concerns.Given how marginal his client's defamation claims against the Doe are, Coakley may have felt he had no choice but to skirt the ethical edge by violating this rule. [read post]
20 Aug 2014, 6:50 pm
Catholics are also taught that they must consume consecrated hosts immediately upon receiving them and that they may never take the Consecrated Host from the Church. c. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 5:38 am
Martha Coakley (D) I WON St. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 1:35 pm
For more on Partners, the Massachusetts experiment and Massachusetts Attorney General Martha Coakley, see this post on global payments and earlier Massachusetts Attorney General and special commission reports and other resources linked to from the post. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 4:22 pm
Indeed, Attorney General Coakley commented: "Consumers expect businesses to not only develop policies and procedures to safeguard their sensitive personal information, but to follow these procedures as well. [read post]
5 Mar 2011, 8:42 pm
In the meantime, Attorney General Martha Coakley has stated that the re-worked bill will be one of her priorities for the legislative session that began in January. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 10:08 am
Coakley (09-592): Originally conference of 3.5.10 CORRECTION: The watch list above originally included the petition Ryan v. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 9:40 am
Martha Coakley. [read post]
27 May 2016, 3:17 pm
IV, § 7(c)(1); see also Cal. [read post]
2 Aug 2021, 5:29 pm
Coakley (2014), the Court struck down a 35-foot buffer zone outside a clinic in part because [T]he zones … compromise petitioners' ability to initiate the close, personal conversations that they view as essential to "sidewalk counseling. [read post]
18 May 2009, 8:16 pm
Ulysses C. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 5:01 am
Coakley (2014). [read post]
12 Oct 2021, 5:27 am
Coakley (2014). [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 10:56 am
Coakley (09-592) and postponed it to a later edition of Petitions to Watch, due to the Court's request for a response that is now due February 4. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 5:05 am
Coakley, the Court held that an ordinance didn't become viewpoint-based even when it restricted only speech outside abortion clinics, and thus obviously affected one viewpoint more than others: It is true, of course, that by limiting the buffer zones to abortion clinics, the Act has the "inevitable effect" of restricting abortion-related speech more than speech on other subjects. [read post]
11 Feb 2019, 3:05 pm
The Appellate Court held—in my view, correctly—that this provision violates the First Amendment: "[C]ontent-based laws, which target speech based on its communicative content, are presumed to be invalid. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 8:23 am
I wasn't diagnosed with Hepatitis C until I was in my mid-40s, but I believe I contracted the disease from that transfusion. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 6:25 am
Coakley, 134 S.Ct. 2518 (2014). [read post]
9 Sep 2021, 7:57 am
Coakley (2014), the Court struck down a 35-foot buffer zone outside a clinic in part because [T]he zones … compromise petitioners' ability to initiate the close, personal conversations that they view as essential to "sidewalk counseling. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 7:00 am
Coakley and Riley v. [read post]
