Search for: "CALIFORNIA COMPANY v. STATE INDUSTRIAL COURT"
Results 21 - 40
of 2,368
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Feb 2020, 4:49 pm
” As a result of that order, the State of California cannot enforce AB 5 against the trucking industry until the case is decided. [read post]
5 Apr 2022, 12:57 pm
The state simply doesn’t have enough staff to adequately police these industries. [read post]
3 May 2018, 7:38 am
Borello & Sons, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Mar 2021, 12:20 pm
The court held in Donohue v. [read post]
4 Nov 2020, 11:02 am
(As we explained here, AB 5 codified and expanded the controversial “ABC” test adopted by the California Supreme Court in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 12:29 pm
According to the Court, the law did not violate the dormant commerce clause in regulating the pork industry outside California. [read post]
31 Jul 2018, 12:34 pm
United Airlines, Inc. and Oman v. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 11:20 pm
Co. v. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 1:29 pm
Reports state that the California Employment Law Council has filed an amicus request to ask the Court to clarify whether the new test is prospective only. [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 3:13 pm
(…) (See, e.g., Asahi Metal Industry Co., Ltd. v. [read post]
1 Sep 2021, 7:28 am
The court says Hartford Casualty Insurance Co. v. [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 4:53 pm
This uptick has not only heightened the legal and financial pressures on companies across various industries but also raised questions about the broader implications for the state’s business environment. [read post]
20 Nov 2019, 1:33 pm
District Court for the Southern District of California, CTA seeks declaratory and injunctive relief that would bar the State of California from applying the ABC test to the trucking industry. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 7:45 am
--Court: Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate DistrictOpinion Date: 7/30/10Cite: Silguero v. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 1:16 pm
California v. [read post]
18 Feb 2007, 1:43 pm
The California Supreme Court, in a unanimous decision, this past Thursday made it possible for people who become ill from smoking to once again obtain justice from tobacco companies, rejecting a 4 year-old federal court decision that virtually halted all smoker lawsuits in the state. [read post]
10 Oct 2012, 8:26 am
In Wanke, Industrial, Commercial, Residential, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 1:03 pm
The California federal court had no patience with Liberty stating, “ERISA cases are irrelevant to California insurance law. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 11:34 am
Supreme Court Ruling In Augustus, et al. v. [read post]
26 Sep 2019, 12:05 pm
Sweeney v. [read post]
