Search for: "CALIFORNIA COMPANY v. STATE INDUSTRIAL COURT" Results 21 - 40 of 2,374
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Apr 2024, 9:27 am by CFM Admin
Of note, the Terraform ruling is in conflict with the same district court’s ruling in SEC v. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 2:14 pm by Daly Barnett
There are some piecemeal attempts at data protection for healthcare workers in more protective states like California (one which we’ve covered). [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 2:41 pm by vforberger
State of California, 89 Cal.App.5th 131, 305 Cal.Rptr.3d 717 (2023), and an additional decision from the California Supreme Court is expected this year. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 4:37 pm by INFORRM
United States The United States District Court for the Northern District of California issued its decision to grant the Center for Countering Digital Hate’s (CCDH) motion to strike out under an anti-SLAPP statute in the case of X CCDH. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
Indeed, as one federal court recently stated, “the ‘crypto’ nomenclature may be of recent vintage, but the challenged transactions fall comfortably within the framework that courts have used to identify securities for nearly eighty years. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 7:57 am by Gabriel Greif
In the months since the California Supreme Court issued its ruling, oil and gas companies have launched aggressive legal campaigns seeking to misapply Chevron v. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 9:30 pm by ernst
”  This year’s recipient is Gerardo Con Díaz, Yale University, for Patent Law and the Materiality of Inventions in the California Oil Industry: The Story of Halliburton v. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 6:00 am by Sherica Celine
Where a lack of permanence is due to operational characteristics that are unique or intrinsic to particular businesses or industries and the workers they employ, this factor is not necessarily indicative of independent contractor status unless the worker is exercising their own independent business initiative. 26 4. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 9:03 pm by renholding
Levinson, 485 U.S. 224, 231, 232, and 240 (1988) (holding that information is material if there is a substantial likelihood that a reasonable investor would consider the information important in deciding how to vote or make an investment decision; and quoting TSC Industries, Inc. v. [read post]