Search for: "CAMPBELL v. SHERMAN"
Results 21 - 30
of 30
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Dec 2010, 6:04 am
Writing for SCOTUSblog, Jud Campbell recaps Monday’s argument in Walker v. [read post]
25 Apr 2010, 3:44 pm
As American Needle, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 2:19 pm
Justice Souter wrote the unanimous 1984 opinion in Campbell v. [read post]
5 Jul 2009, 5:01 pm
Campbell v. [read post]
5 Jul 2009, 2:23 pm
Citing Campbell v Acuff and Sun Trust Bank v Houghton Mifflin, District Judge Batts lambasted any contention held by the defendants that 60 Years Later was a work of parodic comment or criticism: "the Court found such contentions to be post-hoc rationalizations employed through vague generalizations about the alleged naiveté of original, rather than reasonably perceivable parody. [read post]
26 Sep 2008, 11:45 pm
Margaret Atwood on creativity (Michael Geist) National Graduate Caucus on copyright reform (Michael Geist) Supreme Court dismisses auto parts resellers' leave to appeal in action seeking expungement of trade marks for non-distinctiveness and abandonment: Hyundai Auto Canada v Cross Canada Auto Body Supply (West) Ltd & Ors (Canadian Trademark Blog) 'Why copyright? [read post]
18 Sep 2008, 8:56 pm
Issue: Whether, under Seminole Tribe v. [read post]
19 Jul 2008, 1:09 am
Sherman in his Texas State & Local Tax Law BlogAlso worth noting: Fox Rothschild attorney Francis G.X. [read post]
8 Nov 2007, 7:56 am
Box 929 Denver, CO 80201-0929 Phone: (800) 359-1991 (Toll Free) Web: http://www.cchp.org Hearing Impairments Programs for Children and Youth who are Deaf or Hard of Hearing Colorado Department of Education 201 East Colfax Avenue Denver, CO 80203 Phone: (303) 866-6960 Web: http://www.cde.state.co.us Colorado School for the Deaf and the Blind 33 North Institute Street Colorado Springs, CO 80903-3599 Phone: (719) 578-2100 TTY: (719) 578-2101 E-mail: csdbsupt@csdb.org Web: http://www.csdb.org … [read post]
22 Feb 2007, 9:47 pm
Campbell (2003), and properly allowed the jury to consider nonparty harm only in assessing reprehensibility. [read post]
