Search for: "CAUSE OF ACTION INSTITUTE v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE" Results 21 - 40 of 384
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Nov 2014, 7:27 pm
Thanks.This post includes a draft of the next chapter of Part III (Institutional Architecture of Law and Governance: The United States and Law Making) -- Chapter 14 (The State and the People; Popular Referenda). [read post]
2 Feb 2022, 10:15 am by Sam Cohen, Alex Vivona
The United States has repeatedly reaffirmed that the archipelago falls within its mutual defense treaty with Japan. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am by Bernard Bell
S. ___, 141 S.Ct. 1220 (2021); see, Bernard Bell, A Little Blue Birdie Told Me: Knight First Amendment Institute v. [read post]
2 Feb 2022, 10:15 am by Sam Cohen, Alex Vivona
The United States has repeatedly reaffirmed that the archipelago falls within its mutual defense treaty with Japan. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 9:16 am by Charlotte Butash, Margaret Taylor
As for the McGahn case, Mooppan states, Congress as a whole has declined to provide a statutory basis for jurisdiction over a cause of action for the House’s suit, and the House cannot circumvent those limitations by relying on the general federal-jurisdiction statute. [read post]
4 Feb 2021, 5:01 am by Gary Corn
It effectively cemented the Defense Department ’s ban into law in the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for Fiscal 2020. [read post]
30 Nov 2016, 9:00 am by David Kimball-Stanley
Beyond the agency’s security concerns, the State Department feared that United States could be blamed if a terrorist organization committed an act of violence abroad using 3D-printed weapons made with files uploaded in the United States. [read post]
10 May 2017, 6:26 am by Kate Howard
Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit’s reasoning in United States v. [read post]
In both Gonzalez and Taamneh, the Solicitor General will also be arguing on behalf of the United States. [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 10:00 am by Jordan Brunner
The government also asserts Kaspersky’s loss of revenue is not necessarily caused by the government’s actions, and that Kaspersky has not established a causal relationship to that effect. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 10:19 am by Judy Selby
Corcino & Associates et al., CV 13-3728 GAF (JCx), United States District Court Central District (October 7, 2013). [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 11:36 am by Peter Margulies
In its reply brief urging the Ninth Circuit to stay Judge James Robart’s temporary restraining order  against President Trump’s Refugee Executive Order (EO), the Justice Department has tried to move the court battle to more defensible ground. [read post]