Search for: "CERT Holdings LLC" Results 21 - 40 of 467
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Nov 2023, 8:41 am by Dennis Crouch
  If cert is granted, this would be a very important case. [read post]
15 Nov 2023, 1:28 pm by John Elwood
Share The Relist Watch column examines cert petitions that the Supreme Court has “relisted” for its upcoming conference. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 5:53 am by John Elwood
Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit holds that courts make that decision, the U.S. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 9:05 pm by renholding
This transformation was accomplished pursuant to a divisive merger under the Texas Business Organizations Code, pursuant to which JJCI was terminated and the two new Texas LLCs, were created. [read post]
27 Oct 2023, 7:12 am by John Elwood
(relisted after the Sept. 26, Oct. 6 and Oct. 13 conferences) 335-7 LLC v. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 11:17 am by John Elwood
ShareThe Relist Watch column examines cert petitions that the Supreme Court has “relisted” for its upcoming conference. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 9:05 pm by renholding
During my recent visit to Columbia Law School, Professor John Coffee shared with me a draft of a short article that later appeared in the New York Law Journal.[1] Coffee’s article assessed the prospects in the U.S. [read post]
21 Jul 2023, 3:53 pm by Kalvis Golde
ShareThe Petitions of the Week column highlights a selection of cert petitions recently filed in the Supreme Court. [read post]
21 Jul 2023, 6:00 am by Jordan Steinberg
” (CPLR 302 [a] [1]; Aybar v US Tires & Wheels of Queens, LLC, 211 Ad 3d 40, 48-49 [2d Dept 2022].) [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 3:33 pm by John Elwood
ShareThe Relist Watch column examines cert petitions that the Supreme Court has “relisted” for its upcoming conference. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 6:55 am by John Elwood
Share The Relist Watch column examines cert petitions that the Supreme Court has “relisted” for its upcoming conference. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 7:41 am by Eric Goldman
It’s great that the Supreme Court granted cert in two companion cases because this will give the Supreme Court more relevant facts to inform its holdings. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 12:04 pm by Ted Max
”[19] The Supreme Court emphasized that its opinion was narrow and that “[o]n infringement, we hold only that Rogers does not apply when the challenged use of a mark is as a mark” and [o]n dilution, we hold only that the noncommercial exclusion does not shield parody or other commentary when its use of a mark is similarly source-identifying. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 11:54 am by Ted Max
”[19] The Supreme Court emphasized that its opinion was narrow and that “[o]n infringement, we hold only that Rogers does not apply when the challenged use of a mark is as a mark” and [o]n dilution, we hold only that the noncommercial exclusion does not shield parody or other commentary when its use of a mark is similarly source-identifying. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 11:46 am by Ted Max
”[19] The Supreme Court emphasized that its opinion was narrow and that “[o]n infringement, we hold only that Rogers does not apply when the challenged use of a mark is as a mark” and [o]n dilution, we hold only that the noncommercial exclusion does not shield parody or other commentary when its use of a mark is similarly source-identifying. [read post]