Search for: "CHAMBERS v. COX" Results 21 - 40 of 61
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Dec 2015, 4:00 am by Barry Sookman
Copyright Office Updates Their “Fair Use” Database https://t.co/OmVU3FH14l -> News: Court of Appeal dismiss Mirror Phone Hacking Appeals on all grounds https://t.co/4jfL6VuLiR -> Strasbourg: Zakharov v Russia, Grand Chamber re-affirms case law on state surveillance https://t.co/dnS6bJHpdt -> Exceptions To Copyright To Remain On Agenda Of WIPO Copyright Committee https://t.co/uCp018Yi3g -> Streaming Royalties Rise, but Not as High as Music Industry Wanted… [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 9:25 am by Charon QC
Idly fumbling through the electronic annals of Parliament House, the humble case of Daniel Cox v. [read post]
1 Jul 2012, 5:52 pm by INFORRM
On Wednesday 27 June 2012, a three judge Divisional Court, the Lord Chief Justice, Owen and Griffiths Williams JJ heard the “Twitter joke” case, Chambers v DPP. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 2:30 am by INFORRM
  The first, Gold v Cox ([2012] EWHC 272 (QB)) concerned the threatened publication of a book about Jacqueline Gold, the chief executive of Ann Summers. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 2:55 am by NCC Staff
Bork’s opponents were critical of his opinions about the Supreme Court’s Roe v. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 3:04 am by INFORRM
The full list of resolved complaints from last week: Mr Peter Reynolds v The Mail on Sunday, Clause 1, 20/04/2012; Samaritans, Mind, Rethink Mental Illness, Sane and PAPYRUS Prevention of Young Suicide v The Sun, Clause 5, 19/04/2012; Mr Adam Stephens v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 19/04/2012; Mr Peter Reynolds v Harborough Mail, Clause 1, 19/04/2012; Mrs Drene Brown v Scunthorpe Telegraph, Clause 1, 19/04/2012; A woman v Hastings and St Leonards… [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 2:51 am by Mandelman
The Permanent Editorial Board of the Uniform Law Institute (you know what that is if you listened to my recent podcast with attorney Thomas Cox), has just a few days ago published a paper rendering an opinion on the Article 3 v. [read post]