Search for: "CHANDLER v. LACK"
Results 21 - 40
of 121
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jun 2021, 4:15 am
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) transferred Ronald Chandler et. al. v. [read post]
14 Jun 2021, 4:15 am
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) transferred Ronald Chandler et. al. v. [read post]
7 Apr 2021, 8:14 am
WG Chandler Villas SH LLC, 2021 WL 1087200 (D. [read post]
19 Mar 2021, 9:30 am
In this guest post he provides his observations of the damages testimony in VLSI Technologies v. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 8:34 am
State v. [read post]
19 Aug 2020, 6:21 am
The shareholder primacy approach of Delaware law is well summarized by then Chancellor William Chandler in the case of eBay Domestic Holdings, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Jul 2020, 6:07 pm
Salzburg et al. v. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 7:21 am
Chandler v. [read post]
26 Mar 2020, 1:25 pm
Chandler, 458 F. [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 10:00 am
In 1972, the court ruled in Furman v. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 4:31 pm
The case of Chandler v O’Connor [2019] EWHC 3181 (QB) concerned allegations of money laundering and covertly using connections with Russia to lobby for a ‘hard’ Brexit. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 9:46 am
Inc. v. [read post]
25 Nov 2018, 4:29 pm
See, 04680-18 Cosentino v Thurrock Independent. 01735-18 Chandler v The New European, provisions 1 (accuracy), breach with the sanction of a correction by the publication 02176-18 Chandler v Mail on Sunday, provision 1, breach after investigation 04419-18 Muslim Council of Britain v The Times, provision 1, no breach after investigation Resolution Statement 04791-18 Legatum Institute Foundation v The Times, provision 1, resolved directly… [read post]
15 Jan 2018, 1:00 am
On Tuesday 16 January, the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council will hear the appeal of Chandler v The State (Trinidad and Tobago). [read post]
26 Dec 2017, 9:30 pm
Supreme Court in Kokesh v. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 12:01 pm
A&M Records, Inc. v. [read post]
