Search for: "CITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBILITY AND ETHICS IN WASHINGTON v. OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION"
Results 21 - 40
of 106
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jan 2022, 3:00 am
Palin v. [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 3:00 am
The Biden administration argues Congress intended the provision as an anti-corruption measure. [read post]
24 Oct 2021, 9:05 pm
Narratives of litigation abuse were rampant in the national media and gaining steam in Washington, D.C., from the K Street lobby firms to the halls on Capitol Hill. [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 4:00 am
“Not since Bush v. [read post]
27 Aug 2021, 4:00 am
In Shelby County v. [read post]
13 Aug 2021, 4:00 am
But DeJoy’s family businesses continue to lease four North Carolina office buildings to XPO. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 5:30 am
He explained the situation this way: first, Enron had Directors and Officers insurance which covers legal fees when a Director or an Officer has been accused of some sort of wrongdoing. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 7:23 am
To many in Washington, the rise of China and the revanchism of Russia herald the return of great power competition. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 3:00 am
But experts say it is the president’s son-in-law, Howard Krein, who could present fresh ethical challenges for the new administration. [read post]
11 Feb 2021, 7:39 pm
The Archive worked with co-plaintiffs – the Society for Historians of American Foreign Relations (SHAFR) and the American Historical Association (AHA), as well as Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) – to bring the case under the records laws, against President Trump, the Executive Office of the President, and the National Archives & Records Administration (NARA). [read post]
21 Jan 2021, 12:54 pm
Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, 20-330, concerns whether business competitors of the Trump International Hotel have the right to sue the then-president under the foreign and domestic emoluments clauses. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 5:01 am
When the Biden administration takes office on Jan. 20, one place that will likely see quick and decisive change is the U.S. [read post]
2 Dec 2020, 2:45 am
In McNally v. [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 7:32 am
Davis, and NLRB v. [read post]
7 Sep 2020, 10:04 am
That framework saw an executive far more subservient to the legislative branch and far more ministerial in nature (George Washington’s entire executive branch numbered fewer than 100 people). [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 4:45 pm
As this Commission recognized in Public Admonition of Letsinger (Ind. 1997): "Judges are not forbidden from making public comments; in fact, they should be encouraged to engage in temperate and judicious speech on any subject, so long as the speech does not compromise the high ethical standards by which judges, unlike other citizens, are held. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 2:40 pm
Nathaniel Sobel discussed the recent developments in the Trump v. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 4:57 pm
Accordingly, the Court directed the State to take down the banners and prohibited the public placement of any additional banners containing personal data of individuals without authority of law.United StatesCitizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington v. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 9:32 am
Washington and Colorado Department of State v. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 4:41 pm
And yet the tension--Americans find it impossible to use anything but the language of law to speak politics, morality, ethics, and social cohesion. [read post]
