Search for: "CLARK et al v. CLARK et al"
Results 21 - 40
of 533
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Apr 2023, 9:57 am
USA Today Sports Media Group, et al., the named plaintiff alleges that she and other “site editors” were misclassified as independent contractors rather than employees and not paid owed overtime. [read post]
22 Apr 2023, 6:23 am
Chase, Helen Hershkoff, John Sorabji, Rolf Stürner et al.) [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 6:00 am
Decided and Entered:April 6, 2023 535386 In the Matter of the Arbitration between County of Albany, Respondent, and Civil Service Employees Association, Inc., Local 1000, AFSCME, AFL-CIO, Albany County Local 801, et al., Appellants. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 6:00 am
Decided and Entered:April 6, 2023 535386 In the Matter of the Arbitration between County of Albany, Respondent, and Civil Service Employees Association, Inc., Local 1000, AFSCME, AFL-CIO, Albany County Local 801, et al., Appellants. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 9:23 am
Manahe et al., No. 2:22-cr-00013 (D. [read post]
19 Mar 2023, 11:42 am
Connell et al., that Diane Dickens Hamon could file a medical malpractice action for the wrongful death of her father, James Isaac Dickens, Jr. against William Clark Connell, M.D., and South Georgia Emergency Medicine Associates, P.C. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 9:59 am
Clark v. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 9:51 am
By Atreya Mathur “By far, the greatest danger of Artificial Intelligence is that people conclude too early that they understand it. [read post]
18 Dec 2022, 3:52 pm
The federal district court decision in the case of Bell v. [read post]
8 Dec 2022, 6:06 am
” (See Prosecutor v Karadzić (Decision) 16 May 1995 (ICTY Trial Chamber) paras 23-24.) [read post]
4 Dec 2022, 5:20 am
AL., FEDERAL PRACTICE & PROCEDURE: EVIDENCE §5501 (1st ed.) [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 2:28 pm
”[18]Further, it was argued that while the claim of authorship by species other than homo sapiens may be novel, “authorship” under the Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C § 101 et seq., is sufficiently broad so as to permit the protection of the law to extend to any original work, including those created by Naruto. [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 2:28 pm
”[18]Further, it was argued that while the claim of authorship by species other than homo sapiens may be novel, “authorship” under the Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C § 101 et seq., is sufficiently broad so as to permit the protection of the law to extend to any original work, including those created by Naruto. [read post]
2 Nov 2022, 8:51 am
Adobe et al., Case 1:10-cv-01629-RBW (D.D.C. 2010). [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 12:20 pm
The speakers were Kelly Bennett and Thom Clark from the Legal Department. [read post]
21 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm
Today [August 11], the Federal Trade Commission initiated a proceeding to examine whether we should implement new rules addressing data practices that are unfair or deceptive. [read post]
21 Aug 2022, 5:06 am
In National Assn of Broadcasters v. [read post]
29 Jul 2022, 10:15 am
Herrera, Amber Baylor, et al., Evaluating Legal Needs, 36 Notre Dame J.L. [read post]
22 Jul 2022, 5:43 am
The NAB v. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 8:36 am
Khary Penebaker et al v. [read post]
