Search for: "CLIFT v. STATE"
Results 21 - 40
of 45
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Apr 2011, 5:13 am
(The claimant had relied on the requirements in Huang v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2007] 2 AC 167 at [19]). [read post]
20 Nov 2010, 2:01 am
Its formal first reading was on 26 May 2010 and its second reading on 9 July 2010: In response to the Bill, the new Government stated a commitment to bring forward its own proposals. [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 5:24 am
Reports that, in the case of Clift v Clarke, the applicant has failed in a bid to obtain an order forcing Mail Online to disclose the identities of two people who made comments about her on the newspaper website. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 4:49 pm
A personal status did not need to be immutable or innate (Clift v the United Kingdom no 7205/07 July 2010 and A, and Others v the United Kingdom [GC] no 3455/05 ECHR 2009). 5. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 4:49 pm
A personal status did not need to be immutable or innate (Clift v the United Kingdom no 7205/07 July 2010 and A, and Others v the United Kingdom [GC] no 3455/05 ECHR 2009). 5. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 9:12 pm
Dukes, and Turner v. [read post]
18 Dec 2010, 6:41 am
For example, in Clift v City of Syracuse, 45 AD2d 596, the Appellate Division ruled that if an employee was refused permission to use his or her leave credits and was subsequently terminated, the individual was entitled to payment for his or her unused vacation accruals.Another decision, Degnan v Constantine, 189 AD2d 423, illustrates the strict construction courts generally give to regulations involving the forfeiture of leave credits.Degnan, a State Trooper, was… [read post]
3 May 2012, 5:19 pm
English cases in this category included: Smith v ADFVN ([2008] EWHC 1797 (QB)); Clift v Clarke [2011] EWHC 1164 (QB); and El Diwany v Hansen and Others ([2011] EWHC 2077 (QB)) . [read post]
4 Jul 2010, 2:03 pm
It is arguable that Article 10 places the state under a positive obligation to provide such access. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 4:05 pm
Latest Cases Clift v Slough BC [2010] EWCA Civ 1171 – 21 December 2010, CA (Ward, Thomas and Richards LJJ). [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 12:24 am
; Benedetta Ubertazzi, Intellectual Property and State Immunity from Jurisdiction in the New York Convention of 2004. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 12:25 am
“ Next Week in the Courts The Court of Appeal will hand down judgment in the case of Clift v Slough BC on 21 December 2010. [read post]
31 Oct 2010, 5:30 pm
Reserved Judgments The following reserved judgments after public hearings remain outstanding: Clift v Slough BC heard 23 and 24 June 2010 (Ward, Thomas and Richards LJJ). [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 2:51 am
Reserved Judgments The following reserved judgments after public hearings remain outstanding: Clift v Slough BC heard 23 and 24 June 2010 (Ward, Thomas and Richards LJJ). [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 3:17 am
Reserved Judgments The following reserved judgments after public hearings remain outstanding: Clift v Slough BC heard 23 and 24 June 2010 (Ward, Thomas and Richards LJJ). [read post]
21 Nov 2010, 4:38 pm
Reserved Judgments The following reserved judgments after public hearings remain outstanding: Clift v Slough BC heard 23 and 24 June 2010 (Ward, Thomas and Richards LJJ). [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 4:51 pm
On Friday 3 December 2010 an application in the case of Smith v ADVN (No.9) will be heard by Mr Justice Tugendhat Reserved Judgments The following reserved judgments after public hearings remain outstanding: Clift v Slough BC heard 23 and 24 June 2010 (Ward, Thomas and Richards LJ [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 4:31 am
In Sands v The State of South Australia ([2010] SASC 340) the Supreme Court considered an application for a stay on the grounds of public interest immunity in an action for libel and misfeasance arising out of statements made in the course of a murder investigation. [read post]
7 Nov 2010, 4:03 pm
Reserved Judgments The following reserved judgments after public hearings remain outstanding: Clift v Slough BC heard 23 and 24 June 2010 (Ward, Thomas and Richards LJJ). [read post]
18 Jul 2010, 4:35 am
In Dillon v Cush; Dillon v Boland ([2010] NSWCA 165) the New South Wales Court of Appeal allowed the appeal of the defendant on the basis that the judge’s analysis of qualified privilege and malice was flawed. [read post]
