Search for: "CM v. State"
Results 21 - 40
of 985
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Dec 2014, 9:00 am
This rule is in response to United States v. [read post]
24 Dec 2014, 9:00 am
This rule is in response to United States v. [read post]
24 Dec 2014, 9:00 am
This rule is in response to United States v. [read post]
29 May 2010, 8:56 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 7:36 am
“In light of the district court’s decision in Stewart v. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 6:45 am
Massachusetts In Minuteman Health Inc. v. [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 12:14 pm
§§ 941.29(2)(a), 961.42(1), 961.41(1)(cm)2., and 939.05. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 1:10 am
Allina Health System v. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 11:01 am
In Kindred Nursing Centers Limited Partnership v. [read post]
11 Apr 2007, 9:24 am
"CMS is pleased to launch DOQ-IT University, the first of its kind e-learning platform, to provide assistance to physicians across the United States in the adoption and implementation of electronic health records and care management practices," said CMS Acting Administrator Leslie V. [read post]
1 Dec 2021, 11:37 am
In BST Holdings, LLC v. [read post]
28 Dec 2012, 5:36 am
HADDEN, VERNON V. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 2:36 pm
In the RFI, CMS states that it believes it can “learn from the forwarding-thinking tools utilized by the private sector. [read post]
2 Feb 2023, 1:45 pm
CMS also stated in the final rule that it will not apply a Fee-For-Service (FFS) Adjuster in its RADV audits. [read post]
8 May 2014, 12:49 pm
” CMS directs surveyors to “[v]erify that supervision of the radiology services is restricted to a radiologist who is a member of the medical staff. [read post]
16 May 2013, 3:02 am
Caldera v. [read post]
16 Dec 2014, 11:40 am
On December 12, 2014, CMS published a proposed rule to revise selected conditions of participation (CoPs) for providers, conditions for coverage (CfCs) for suppliers, and requirements for long-term care (LTC) facilities to conform with the Supreme Court decision in United States v. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 8:51 am
V. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 12:15 pm
The purpose of the lawsuit, entitled Figueroa v Burwell (PDF), is stated to be “to require HHS to provide blind individuals meaningful and equally effective access to their Medicare information, as required by Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 11:38 am
The final rule is especially important for providers in light of the Supreme Court’s decision in Armstrong v. [read post]
