Search for: "CO John Doe No. 1" Results 21 - 40 of 3,252
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 May 2024, 9:07 am by Brian Albrecht
That’s exactly what Eric Bartelsman, John Haltiwanger, and Stefano Scarpetta found in the data.[1] For example, the OP term was negative in many Eastern European countries in the 1990s (less productive companies captured more of the market). [read post]
13 May 2024, 12:57 am by INFORRM
Associated Newspapers Ltd (ANL) is the corporate entity defending the case brought by the likes of Prince Harry, Sir Elton John and Doreen Lawrence. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:01 am by Matthew A. Seligman
 Scenario 1: Immunity for Core Article II Powers Only  The Supreme Court might rule that only “core” powers of the presidency are immune from prosecution, and that none of those are at issue in this case. [read post]
9 May 2024, 2:00 pm by Joanna Herzik
When he sent the alleged John Deere separation agreement, it had some strange wording, and the letterhead looked off. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 6:31 pm by Greg Lambert and Marlene Gebauer
I did think about hey, what about, like, John Grisham with legal tech? [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 6:36 am by The Petrie-Flom Center Staff
Piatt, JD, is a Research Scholar and Co-Director with the Center for Public Health Law & Policy, at the Sandra Day O’Connor College of Law, ASU. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 7:00 am by bklemm@foley.com
John Deere Co., 383 U.S. 1 (1966), including assessing the scope and content of the prior art; ascertaining the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art; and resolving the level of ordinary skill in the art before determining obviousness or nonobviousness of the claimed subject matter. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am by Bernard Bell
  A public official’s social media activity constituted state action under §1983 only if the official both (1) possessed actual authority to speak on the state’s behalf, and (2) purported to exercise that authority when speaking on social media. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
And it is incumbent on each of us to make sure it does not come to pass and that investors are not harmed by noncompliance with the securities laws when it comes to this new technology. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
Section 1 requires all applicants to be depository institutions that are legally eligible to have master accounts. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm by admin
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
In two of my last three Verdict columns (this one and then this one co-authored with Jason Mazzone), I have discussed—in connection with the Supreme Court’s consideration in Trump v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am by admin
When the Supreme Court decided the Daubert case in June 1993, two recent verdicts in silicone-gel breast implant cases were fresh in memory.[1] The verdicts were large by the standards of the time, and the evidence presented for the claims that silicone caused autoimmune disease was extremely weak. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 8:29 am by Dennis Crouch
Patent No. 1,877,504, issued to Dow Chemical employees John Grebe and Ross Sanford on September 12, 1932. [read post]