Search for: "COFIELD"
Results 21 - 40
of 49
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jun 2012, 6:25 am
If you would like to help but can't demo we could also use a couple of people to help direct people to the various demos and answer questions.So far, the following people have offered to demo: Cindy Bassett - Mindmapping w/ MindomoTom Boone - Sigil (a wysiwyg e-book editor)Melanie Cofield - LibGuidesKarina Condra - Zoho (online database creation software)Debbie Ginsberg - Mindmapping tools generally (web & iPad)Wilhelmina Randtke - Adobe Acrobat Professional (little… [read post]
15 May 2012, 8:36 am
Cofield, 127 N.J. 328, 336 (1992)). [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 3:02 am
Cofield signed. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 1:40 pm
The Cofield test requires that: 1. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 9:07 am
William Cofield, Jr., a/k/a “Duke,” 25, of Hampton, Va. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 5:36 am
” Cofield, supra, 127 N.J. at 338. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 12:41 pm
With regard to Cofield’s first prong, State v. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 12:24 pm
Cofield, 127 N.J. 328, 336 (1992). [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 1:04 pm
The Cofield test requires that: 1. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 6:09 pm
19 Aug 2010, 9:39 pm
The New Jersey Supreme Court has outlined four factors, called “Cofield factors” used to determine whether evidence of prior crimes or bad acts should be admitted: (1) the evidence of other crimes must be admissible as relevant to a material issue; (2) it must be similar in kind and reasonably close in time to the offense charged; (3) the evidence of prior crimes must be clear and convincing; and (4) the probative value of the evidence must not be outweighed by its… [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 12:04 pm
” Cofield, supra, 127 N.J. at 338. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 3:26 pm
The Cofield test requires that: 1. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 8:21 am
But here, there was no N.J.R.E. 104 hearing, no evaluation of the proposed testimony in light of Cofield occurred, no proffer was made by the State as to the basis for the admissibility of the evidence of prior crimes pursuant to N.J.R.E. 404(b), and no limiting instruction was given to the jury with respect to its consideration of that evidence. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 5:00 am
As we said last week, because it’s a Dechert case, we can’t comment directly on Clark v. [read post]
25 Aug 2009, 1:14 am
., Cofield v. [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 5:00 am
Cofield added, "At the end of the day, the city paid for their mistake, not the officers. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 4:18 am
It’s Friday, and here are my leftover blog ideas: *In case you missed it, the Hartford Courtant’s Stan Simpson wrote a column on Judge Cofield. [read post]
11 Feb 2009, 9:01 pm
While speaking on her cellphone, Judge Cofield referred to Sgt. [read post]
11 Feb 2009, 5:31 am
While not the N-word rampage Judge Cofield went on, the Mississippi Supreme Court still felt for his real talk observations Judge Osborne deserved a slap on the hand. [read post]
