Search for: "COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. Brown" Results 21 - 40 of 84
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Dec 2017, 9:01 am by CFM Admin
CA RIAs to pooled investment vehicles may avoid the independent party and surprise examinations requirements by having audited financial statements prepared by an independent public accountant registered with the PCAOB and distributing such audited financial statements to all limited partners (or members or other beneficial owners) of the pooled investment vehicle, and to the Commissioner of the California Department of Business Oversight (“DBO”). [read post]
15 Dec 2017, 9:01 am by CFM Admin
CA RIAs to pooled investment vehicles may avoid the independent party and surprise examinations requirements by having audited financial statements prepared by an independent public accountant registered with the PCAOB and distributing such audited financial statements to all limited partners (or members or other beneficial owners) of the pooled investment vehicle, and to the Commissioner of the California Department of Business Oversight (“DBO”). [read post]
30 Oct 2017, 2:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
On Wednesday 1 November 2017, the Supreme Court will hand down the judgment in the case of Littlewoods Ltd & Ors v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs. [read post]
6 Jun 2016, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Brown & Anor, the Joint Administrators of Loanwell Ltd v Stonegale Ltd (Scotland) and other cases, heard 15 February 2016. [read post]
9 May 2016, 12:05 am by Anthony Fairclough
Eclipse Film Partners No 35 LLP v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs and another case, heard 13-14 April 2016. [read post]
1 May 2016, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Eclipse Film Partners No 35 LLP v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs and another case, heard 13-14 April 2016. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Eclipse Film Partners No 35 LLP v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs and another case, heard 13-14 April 2016. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 1:03 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Eclipse Film Partners No 35 LLP v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs and another case, heard 13-14 April 2016. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
NYK Bulkship (Atlantic) NV v Cargill International SA, heard 1-2 December 2015. [read post]
5 Mar 2016, 3:30 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
UBS AG v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs, heard 3 December 2015. [read post]
26 Feb 2016, 7:58 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
UBS AG v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs, heard 3 December 2015. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
UBS AG v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs, heard 3 December 2015. [read post]
12 Feb 2016, 7:52 am by Matrix Legal Su
UBS AG v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs, heard 3 December 2015. [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 1:00 am by Aimee Denholm
UBS AG v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs, heard 3 December 2015. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 5:05 pm by Kevin LaCroix
 For public corporations in particular, the aftershocks of a financial reporting problem can pale in comparison to the debilitating revenue loss, not to mention the regulatory onslaught and litigation fallout, experienced in the aftermath of a cyber-attack. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
PMS International Ltd v Magmatic Ltd, heard 3 November 2015. [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 6:01 am by Administrator
There has been a constant battle between wealthy taxpayers who have endeavoured to avoid or minimise the taxes that they pay, on the one hand, and revenue authorities who are charged with ensuring that everybody meets their legal obligations in relation to tax, on the other. [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 7:40 pm
In denying relief, Acting Surrogate Brown relied upon section 3740 of the 1939 Internal Revenue Code. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 6:48 pm
In denying relief, Acting Surrogate Brown relied upon section 3740 of the 1939 Internal Revenue Code. [read post]