Search for: "CONSOLIDATED ELEVATOR CO., INC."
Results 21 - 32
of 32
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Feb 2011, 10:35 am
"In a unanimous opinion, the First Department affirmed the dismissal of plaintiff's Labor Law § 240(1) claim, holding that plaintiff "was not protected by the statute since his duties as a flagman did not entail elevation-related risks"(citing Rocovich v Consolidated Edison Co., 78 NY2d 509, 514 [1991]; Modeste v Mega Constr. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 7:26 am
AT&T Inc., et al. (09-1279). [read post]
19 May 2010, 3:31 am
Consolidated Freightways, Inc. 140 N.J. 452 (NJ 1995), the Supreme Court unanimously recognized that an occupational heart condition is compensable under the Workers' Compensation Act. [read post]
6 Mar 2010, 8:55 am
Co., 81 NY2d 494, 500-501 [1993], quoting Rocovich v Consolidated Edison Co., 78 NY2d 509, 514 [1991]). [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 4:40 am
Control Consolidation – Which First? [read post]
24 Jul 2009, 5:37 am
§ 1407, and Transfers Actions to Southern District of New York Thirty (30) individual and class action lawsuits were filed against Bank of America and other defendants arising out of “alleged misrepresentations and omissions made in the context of Bank of America’s acquisition of Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. [read post]
26 May 2009, 1:53 am
Consolidated Edison Co., 409 F. 3d 506 (6/2/05) - Affirmed denial of a temporary injunction in a case brought by a terminated employee. [read post]
26 Apr 2009, 6:17 am
York Hunter Constr., Inc., 95 N.Y.2d. 883, 885 (2000)(slipping while climbing out of a construction vehicle is not an elevation related risk calling for a protective device). [read post]
22 Jul 2008, 1:29 am
Co., Inc., 10 N.Y.3d 333 (2008) that when the statute -- which requires that owners and contractors give workers "proper protection" against elevation related risks (both falling from scaffolds and ladders, or being struck by falling objects) -- says "owners," that includes out-of-possession landlords. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 2:44 pm
See Performance Labs, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Mar 2007, 9:24 pm
In re Elevator Safety Co., Serial Nos. 76507505 (February 21, 2007) [not precedential].Functionality: Applying the Morton-Norwich factors (In re Morton-Norwich Prods., Inc., 213 USPQ 9 (CCPA 1982)), the Board began by considering several third-party utility patents. [read post]
7 Feb 2007, 9:48 pm
American Tobacco Co., 161 F.3d 127 (3d Cir. 1998). [read post]
