Search for: "CORRECTIONS CABLE TELEVISION" Results 21 - 40 of 219
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jul 2015, 11:21 am
  I’m not sure whether cable television operators really care much about offering wired voice telephony. [read post]
20 Dec 2009, 1:59 am
There is nothing simple about marrying your sweetheart and raising a couple of kids so far out in the country that you cannot pick up a television signal and cable is out of the question. [read post]
12 Sep 2014, 11:01 am by Glenn
If that is correct, one would anticipate a new round of FCC rulemaking and, in the case of an Apple-Comcast set-top box, a complex and contentious regulatory review. [read post]
8 May 2013, 7:48 am by FHH Law
Cable “must carry and must offer” mechanisms will be implemented and will become a legal obligation for cable TV systems. [read post]
28 Apr 2013, 8:01 am
“Most of what we do on television was developed by Desi Arnaz” in the 1950s, he said. [read post]
Similarly, the subscriber privacy provisions of The Cable Communications Policy Act of 1984 (“The Cable Act”) established a highly protective notice and consent scheme, permitting cable television subscribers to know what a cable operator’s practices are and providing them an opportunity to limit the data collections and disclosures that the operator may make. [read post]
10 Aug 2016, 1:00 am
 Get AS is a distributor of cable services, which does not produce original television content itself, but puts together packages of channels which are offered to subscribers. [read post]
27 Dec 2017, 11:00 pm by Sever | Storey
Utilities can place power lines, cable television, or internet fibre underground or overhead, but one thing is certain—to reach all of the necessary homes and businesses, these lines must often cross over (or under) many private properties. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 6:37 am by Jeff Milyo
(Jeff Milyo) Ross Perot famously characterized lobbyists as “these guys with alligator shoes”; indeed, few vocations are less esteemed than lobbyists, especially since cable television has romanticized bail-bondsman, tattoo artists, and pawn shop owners. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 7:13 am by Giancarlo Frosio
The correct cite form Justice Scalia reads as follows: “[i]t is [ . . . ] the role of Congress to eliminate [loopholes] if it wishes. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 6:29 am by David Oxenford
  One minor correction including in the database that will be used by wireless devices to protect stations from interference will be included - information on a television station's antenna beam tilt. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 1:27 pm by Steve McConnell
The problem with signing up for the "triple play" with your media provider is that when something like, say, a hurricane, knocks out the cable, you lose your television and your internet and your phone. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 4:22 am
Digital Satellites Warranty Cover Limited (DSWCL) and Satellite Services (SS) (the Appellants) were in the business of selling extended warranties to satellite television customers. [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 1:48 pm
Subscribers to Rogers Cable, for instance, could bundle or tether their cable subscription to their mobile phone contract, and in the process receive traditional Rogers cable shows on their handset. [read post]
27 Feb 2011, 9:15 am
Prisoners held in Florida do not have access to cable television. [read post]
1 Feb 2014, 6:43 pm by Bruce E. Boyden
Muedini, 55 F.3d 263, 268-69 (7th Cir. 1995) (ordinary receiver modified to handle nine speakers and extremely long cable runs not home-type). [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 8:30 am by Peter Tannenwald
MVPDs include cable television systems, Open Video Systems (“OVS”), and direct broadcast satellite systems (“DBS”) The new electronic system promises to be simpler and less expensive than the old paper system; but since the electronic system is new, both every TV broadcaster and every MVPD will have to upload some information this year, by specific deadlines, to preserve their legal rights. [read post]
24 Dec 2006, 9:26 am
[Correction: A reader has pointed out that there was indeed a 3-judge panel. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 8:00 am by David Oxenford
  But once Aereo lost its bid in the Supreme Court to carry TV signals without payment, the issue of whether an Internet delivered video service could be considered a cable system which could rely on the statutory license to rebroadcast television stations was Aereo’s fall-back position, about which we wrote here. [read post]