Search for: "COUNCIL v. DANIELS" Results 21 - 40 of 554
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Oct 2016, 8:13 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Council): Omnibus Written Response of Nooksack Tribal Members Proposed for Disenrollment   [read post]
13 Apr 2023, 4:36 pm by Jacob Katz Cogan
Federal Republic of Germany Daniele Amoroso & Riccardo Pavoni, Stergiopoulos v. [read post]
18 Apr 2021, 11:08 am by Giles Peaker
The two notes of judgment below are by Daniel Grütters, of One Pump Court, counsel for Mr Perrott and we are very grateful for them. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 3:03 pm by Andrew Hamm
Magliocca at Balkinization, Lisa Soronen at The Council of State Government’s Knowledge Center, Daniel Fisher at Forbes, Michael Bobelian at Forbes, Michael Dorf at Dorf on Law, Garrett Epps at The Atlantic, Alan Cole at Tax Foundation, and Brianne J. [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 10:06 am by Amy Howe
At Forbes, Daniel Fisher discusses Tuesday’s oral argument in Bond v. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 6:30 am by Mitra Sharafi
This collection shows how important it is, despite the constant temptation to compression, not to lose sight of the contexts and nuances which qualify and illuminate so many leading authorities.TOC after the jump. 1 R v Pease (1832) MARK WILDE AND CHARLOTTE SMITH2 Burón v Denman (1848) CHARLES MITCHELL AND LESLIE TURANO3 George v Skivington (1869) DAVID IBBETSON4 Daniel v Metropolitan Railway Company (1871) MICHAEL LOBBAN5 Woodley v… [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:59 am by Public Employment Law Press
Nor does the agreement demonstrate that the parties intended to arbitrate the claims of violation of wage provisions of the Labor Law asserted in the complaint (see Matter of Berger v New York University, __AD3d__, 2022 NY Slip Op 03313 [1st Dept 2022]; Hichez v United Jewish Council of the E. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:59 am by Public Employment Law Press
Nor does the agreement demonstrate that the parties intended to arbitrate the claims of violation of wage provisions of the Labor Law asserted in the complaint (see Matter of Berger v New York University, __AD3d__, 2022 NY Slip Op 03313 [1st Dept 2022]; Hichez v United Jewish Council of the E. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:59 am by Public Employment Law Press
Nor does the agreement demonstrate that the parties intended to arbitrate the claims of violation of wage provisions of the Labor Law asserted in the complaint (see Matter of Berger v New York University, __AD3d__, 2022 NY Slip Op 03313 [1st Dept 2022]; Hichez v United Jewish Council of the E. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:59 am by Public Employment Law Press
Nor does the agreement demonstrate that the parties intended to arbitrate the claims of violation of wage provisions of the Labor Law asserted in the complaint (see Matter of Berger v New York University, __AD3d__, 2022 NY Slip Op 03313 [1st Dept 2022]; Hichez v United Jewish Council of the E. [read post]
16 Aug 2008, 2:41 pm
The Court of Appeals decision yesterday in the case of Bruce Herdt, Louis Evans and Charlie Milburn v. [read post]
27 Nov 2014, 9:45 pm
Eva Kassoti, Unilateral Legal Acts Revisited: Common Law v. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 4:09 am by Amy Howe
  I covered the oral argument for this blog; other coverage comes from Daniel Fisher of Forbes. [read post]
5 Aug 2007, 3:54 pm
The question, he said, would be whether a particular agreement could accurately be described as covering only such services.There is no mention in the story of the July 16th Indiana COA decision in Anita Stuller, et al v. [read post]