Search for: "COUNTY MATERIALS CORP." Results 21 - 40 of 1,027
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jan 2024, 8:05 pm by John Elwood
  Consider Starbucks Corp. v. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 12:30 pm by John Ross
Footnote coup de grâce: The Corps also shouldn't harass this landowner about his other land lest it risk sanctions for bad-faith conduct. [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 12:30 pm by John Ross
Under the Supreme Court's ruling in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 12:00 am
The Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), also known as Sepah, was designated as a terrorist organization by President Trump in April 2019. [read post]
23 Nov 2023, 10:00 pm
Corp. v Resurrection Temple of Our Lord, Inc. [read post]
15 Sep 2023, 6:08 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
” Jones v 636 Holding Corp., 73 AD3d 409, 409 (1st Dept. 2010); see Landis v 383 Realty Corp., 175 AD3d 1207, 1207 (1st Dept. 2019). [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 9:49 am by Norman L. Eisen
” Jefferson County v Acker, 527 U.S. 423, 447 (1999) (Scalia, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part). [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 5:27 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Where should the claim be brought and if brought in NY is it materially inconvenient? [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm by Andrew Warren
On August 14, 2023, a Fulton County, Georgia grand jury returned a 41-count indictment against former President Donald Trump and eighteen other individuals for a conspiracy to overturn the legitimate 2020 presidential election results in that state. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
To the extent that intra-agency materials contain "instructions to staff that affect the public," they remain subject to disclosure pursuant to FOIL (Public Officers Law § 87[2][g]; see Matter of Gedan v Town of Mamaroneck [N.Y.], 170 AD3d 833, 834-835; see generally Matter of Xerox Corp. v Town of Webster, 65 NY2d 131, 133). [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
To the extent that intra-agency materials contain "instructions to staff that affect the public," they remain subject to disclosure pursuant to FOIL (Public Officers Law § 87[2][g]; see Matter of Gedan v Town of Mamaroneck [N.Y.], 170 AD3d 833, 834-835; see generally Matter of Xerox Corp. v Town of Webster, 65 NY2d 131, 133). [read post]