Search for: "CUFF V. STATE"
Results 21 - 40
of 261
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2019, 3:00 am
Petrosian v. [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 3:19 am
In a kinder, gentler world, the words "you're under arrest" without any accompanying cuffs or restraints may mean you're free to head off with impunity at a measured pace to the nearest coffee shop, or tree top, but in Oregon the words "you're under arrest" means YOU'RE UNDER ARREST AND IN CUSTODY so stop calculating that escape route and forget about that Freedom Road Quickstep maneuver.From the OJD Court of Appeal July 8, 2009, Media Release (or… [read post]
25 Mar 2022, 11:05 am
In Destino v. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 12:15 pm
See State v. [read post]
7 Sep 2009, 4:22 am
Guzman v. [read post]
6 Jan 2018, 5:03 am
See Atwater v. [read post]
11 Dec 2019, 2:47 pm
Carl Zeiss, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 3:46 pm
United States v. [read post]
12 Jul 2013, 7:04 am
In March 2012, she dissented in Cuff v. [read post]
20 Aug 2021, 4:41 pm
Simmons v. [read post]
28 Feb 2013, 8:10 am
The UETA was recently relied upon by an appellate court in Tennessee, Waddle v. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 2:04 pm
Was the suspect in cuffs? [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 6:07 am
United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 2:55 pm
U.S. v. [read post]
23 Sep 2010, 6:16 pm
The cuff is inserted in a deflated state. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 2:08 am
Pereira, a social worker, was terminated after making remarks that she, herself, described as a stupid, racist, and unthinking joke.While citing a line of cases that included Pickering v Board of Education, 31 U.S. 563, and Connick v Meyers, 461 U.S. 138, 1983, the Massachusetts high court said that although a public employee’s speech may be entitled to constitutional protection if the employee speaks out on a matter of public concern, and his or her interests as a citizen… [read post]
Appellate Court Affirms Exclusion of Plaintiff’s Medical Expert Testimony Based on Lack of Certainty
26 Jan 2016, 9:31 am
Cleveland v. [read post]
14 May 2009, 12:25 pm
United States v. [read post]
20 Oct 2009, 10:06 pm
A similar question was recently considered by the Southern District in Victoria Secrets Brand Management v. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 2:43 pm
Lockwood v. [read post]
