Search for: "CUMMINS v. LINE." Results 21 - 40 of 54
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Dec 2023, 5:00 am
The court declined to create a bright-line rule to determine when punitive damages are to be considered to be unconstitutionally excessive.In this case, the jury had awarded $250,000 in compensatory damages as well as a total of $2.8 million dollars in punitive damages. [read post]
30 Oct 2009, 9:17 am
CUMMINS, ESQUIREFor Attorney J. [read post]
20 May 2016, 6:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Cummins, Pennsylvania Law Weekly May 17 2016  A riddle of negligence law has always been to what extent the orbit of responsibility extends outward from a tortfeasor's conduct toward an injured party so as to render the tortfeasor potentially liable as a matter of law.As noted by Dean Prosser in his hornbook on torts and as stated by former Justice Benjamin Cardozo in his famous decision in the case of Palsgraf v. [read post]
14 Aug 2014, 7:08 am by Darius Whelan
 High Court, Cummins v Twitter, February 2014 [defamation, libel, hosting provider, Twitter][The High Court ordered that Twitter remove defamatory posts concerning the mayor of Waterford. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 4:49 pm by Daniel E. Cummins
”The Superior Court’s decision in Trigg is in line with the Pennsylvania Supreme Court’s jury selection decision last year in the case of Shinal v. [read post]
22 Dec 2012, 11:24 am by Daniel E. Cummins
The amendment would bring the state expert discovery rule more in line with its companion federal rule of civil procedure and provide greater protections against expert discovery. [read post]
4 Dec 2009, 3:10 am by Daniel E. Cummins
More recently, Judge Todd Hoover issued a one-line order in the Dauphin County case of Gingrich v Esurance and Susan Graci, No. 08795-CV-2009 (C.P. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 7:45 pm by Daniel E. Cummins
District Court in California recently addressed the validity of this discovery maneuver in the 2010 case of Crispin v. [read post]