Search for: "Cable v. State" Results 21 - 40 of 1,804
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Feb 2024, 1:20 pm
It sounds to me -- again, knowing virtually nothing -- like the streaming services don't pay but cable companies do, despite the fact that both of them use fiber optic cables (or non-fiber optic cables) running under our streets, etc. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
Numerous studies show that Chevron deference is currently the exception rather than the rule, and since 2001’s United States v. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Finally, the petitioners made much of the Court's 2005 decision in National Cable & Telecommunications Association v. [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 8:00 am by Daniel Brown
  If adopted, the new rule would add an arrow to the Commission’s quiver as it seeks to address what the FCC states is an increasing number and duration of broadcast station blackouts across the country over the past decade. [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 7:16 am by Overhauser Law Offices, LLC
Patent Office issued the following xxx patents to persons and businesses in Indiana in November 2023: PATENT NUMBER PATENT TITLE US 11826689 B2 Air filter arrangement; assembly; and, methods US 11830717 B2 Ion focusing US 11826832 B2 Passivation and alloying element retention in gas atomized powders US 11830716 B2 Mass spectrometry analysis of microorganisms in samples US 11828908 B2 Rack-mountable equipment with a high-heat-dissipation module, and transceiver receptacle with increased cooling US… [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 5:50 am by Michael C. Dorf
Dept. of Commerce and Loper Bright Enterprises, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 9:05 pm by Gianna Hill
Supreme Court’s decision in West Virginia v. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 6:49 pm by Chuck Cosson
  That could be accomplished through law and regulation, of course, and there are examples in the law of ways in which such laws balance incentives and interests, e.g., compulsory licensing schemes for cable TV stations retransmitting copyrighted content. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 6:00 am by Overhauser Law Offices, LLC
G&G’s argument states that they were granted the exclusive rights to the commercial distribution of the Saul “Canelo” Alvarez v. [read post]