Search for: "Cain v. State Bar" Results 21 - 40 of 100
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
  Mary Ziegler on the Texas, the Supreme Court and Roe v. [read post]
7 Feb 2016, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
  Cases that might be particularly well-suited to a historian's perspective include United States v. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 1:15 pm by Lyle Denniston
Clinton (10-699) — political question as bar to test of State Department policy on recording foreign birth of citizen (question added by Court on Congress’s power to dictate policy on the issue) Kawashima v. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 11:37 am by Bradley R. Hall, E.D. Mich.
Cain, 708 F.3d 628, 631 (5th Cir. 2013), explaining that "Pinholster's restriction does not bar the federal evidentiary hearing conducted in this case because the district court first concluded, solely on the basis of the state court record, that the state courts committed legal error, as required under 28 U.S.C. [read post]
7 Nov 2010, 10:20 am by Dave Hoffman
The stone-cold coolest was by Sah/Loewenstein/Cain, and presented by SOM’s Daylian Cain. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 4:15 pm by Michael M. O'Hear
Cain, in which the Court — again, acting very much in an error-correction mode — directly took and overturned a state-court decision on Brady grounds. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 10:32 am by Michael O'Hear
Cain, in which the Court — again, acting very much in an error-correction mode — overturned a state-court decision on Brady grounds. [read post]
10 May 2018, 8:02 pm by MOTP
Hammond testified that he became a partner and that he and Travis represented themselves as partners to the public as well to as the bar. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 6:42 am by Joshua Matz
Today, the Court will hear oral argument in United States v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 9:53 am by John Elwood
Powell bars habeas relief if the state fails to [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 2:21 pm by John Elwood
United States, 21-8190Issue: Whether the Supreme Court should overturn its decision in United States v. [read post]