Search for: "Cal State L A" Results 21 - 40 of 1,771
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Reins Int’l Cal., Inc.), California courts have used the state’s supposed overriding interest in PAGA cases to invent a host of novel rules, nearly all of which redound to the benefit of plaintiffs. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 9:22 am by centerforartlaw
In the closing arguments, Plaintiff’s counsel referenced Rybolovlev’s testimony, when he stated that the two developed a close friendship as evidenced by their scheduled monthly lunches, introduction of Rybolovlev’s family to Bouvier, and Bouvier’s attendance of Rybolovlev’s birthday party in Hawaii. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 11:55 am
” In response, the court stated, “Essentially, you’re doing it from a phone in a car, and you can’t use your phone to look at documents and appear in a hearing. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 6:29 pm by Marty Lederman
Ohio apply to the Section 3 question, and that such incitement was a form of “engaging in” the violent insurrection itself—conduct that disqualifies Trump from serving in any future covered federal or state office, including the presidency. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm by renholding
”[2]  In that same policy, the Commission articulated its belief “that a refusal to admit the allegations is equivalent to a denial, unless the defendant or respondent states that he neither admits nor denies the allegations. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 2:51 pm by Kevin LaCroix
”[vi] As for the three remaining causes of action—(6) breach of fiduciary duty, (7) breach of the duty of loyalty, and (8) violation of Section 17200 of California’s Business and Professions Code—the court acknowledged that  “[l]iability . . . could conceivably be sustained ‘based on alleged conduct that has a lower degree of culpability’ that what would be required to establish ‘willful’ conduct under section 533. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm by admin
Not only was the statement wrong in 1993, when the Supreme Court decided the famous Daubert case, it was wrong 20 years later, in 2013, when the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved  Diclegis, a combination of doxylamine succinate and pyridoxine hydrochloride, the essential ingredients in Bendectin, for sale in the United States, for pregnant women experiencing nausea and vomiting.[16] The return of Bendectin to the market, although under a different name,… [read post]