Search for: "California Conveyance Co."
Results 21 - 40
of 53
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jun 2014, 8:58 am
California Trust Co., 33 Cal.2d 501, 202 P.2d 1021 (Cal.1949): “It is against public policy to permit a man to tie up his property in such a way that he can enjoy it but prevent his creditors from reaching it, and where the settlor makes himself a beneficiary of a trust any restraints in the instrument on the involuntary alienation of his interest are invalid and ineffective. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 4:30 am
The lawyer: It is apparent that Sofia’s conveyance of the subject Manhattan condomini [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 1:26 pm
Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Co. - Aug 30: In the U.S. [read post]
23 Jul 2013, 7:07 am
Defendant AHRN, located in California, operates a nationwide real estate search engine. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 10:03 am
Southern California water war. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 1:25 pm
California Coastal Commission, 483 U.S. 825 (1987),and Dolan v. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 8:08 am
”12 As Householder explains: It would be similarly fallacious to say that in a real estate transaction, the money paid to the seller is only a secondary consideration, with the primary value of the transaction consisting of the conveyance of the parcel to the buyer. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 8:08 am
.”12 As Householder explains: It would be similarly fallacious to say that in a real estate transaction, the money paid to the seller is only a secondary consideration, with the primary value of the transaction consisting of the conveyance of the parcel to the buyer. [read post]
17 Oct 2012, 8:34 am
All of the co-sponsors of the bill have spoken out publicly against the Bay Delta Conservation Plan, as this July 25, 2012, press release, entitled "California Representatives Condemn the Bay Delta Conservation Plan, demonstrates. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 2:19 am
California Fish Co., 138 P. 79 (Cal. 1913); Marks v. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 3:27 pm
” California Lands, supra, quoting PPL Montana, LLC v. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 4:18 am
Hise (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) Supreme Court confirms that a download is not a performance: ASCAP v United States (1709 Copyright Blog) (Ars Technica) District Court S D New York: Court nukes another mass defendant file-sharing lawsuit: Digiprotect v Does (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) District Court E D Virginia calls out copyright trolls’ coercive business model, threaten sanctions K-Beech v Does 1–85 (EFF) (Ars Technica) District Court Columbia: Record breaking… [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 1:47 am
For example, in a 1999 decision applying California law, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals held that directors are immune from claims of ordinary negligence brought by the FDIC when they have acted in good faith and on an informed basis. [12] Similarly, in the first court decision rendered in the recent wave of litigation, a federal court in California followed the same reasoning and held that the former directors of a credit union could not be held liable for negligence,… [read post]
13 May 2011, 1:28 pm
” California Uniform Commercial Code (“U.C.C. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 6:32 pm
These are often “vested” under state law, and in some states, like California, are protected by the state constitution. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 11:45 pm
They weree alleged to have participated in the fraudulent conveyance of assets by helping him hide money. [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 2:04 pm
For example, a bank account held in the names of two people will have its funds go to the person who survives the co-owner's death. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 10:32 pm
Co., 220 F.R.D. 40 (M.D.N.C.2004). [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 12:06 pm
Applicable California Law It is not clear exactly how Moreno's arm got caught in the machine. [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 12:10 pm
I should also mention that all of this happened in California. [read post]
