Search for: "California Public Utilities Commission et al"
Results 21 - 40
of 90
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Nov 2020, 3:00 am
Donald Glaser et al., 937 F.3d 1191 (9th Cir. 2019), on remand, 2020 U.S. [read post]
11 Aug 2020, 11:11 am
Last month, the Court of Appeal for the Second Appellate District of California issued a decision in Pico Neighborhood Association, et al v. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 3:00 am
§ 791a et seq.) preempt application of the California Environmental Quality Act (Pub. [read post]
9 Apr 2020, 10:27 am
Avoid sharing of company data, document locations or hyperlinks in any shared ‘chat’ facility that may be public as these may be processed by the service or device in unsafe ways. [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 2:24 pm
On March 4, 2019, in National Women’s Law Center, et al. v. [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 9:01 am
Because the NBAM includes public and proprietary data, coverage details are available only to state and federal “partners” and not the general public. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 9:33 am
Meanwhile, an investigation by the Oregon Public Utility Commission has uncovered problems with Sprint’s compliance with the Lifeline program, leading the FCC to announce (on September 24) that 885,000 of Sprint’s Lifeline customers – 30% of its Lifeline subscriber base – were apparently violating the “non-usage” rule (requiring lines to show service usage at least once per month). [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 5:00 am
California Public Utilities Commission, several small, rural, privately-owned telephone companies asked the California court of appeals to review a decision of the California Public Utilities Commission (“PUC”).[1] The PUC’s ruling related to the companies’ cost of capital, “a measurement of the cost of obtaining debt and equity financing, and it reflects the amount investors would… [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 5:00 am
California Public Utilities Commission, several small, rural, privately-owned telephone companies asked the California court of appeals to review a decision of the California Public Utilities Commission (“PUC”).[1] The PUC’s ruling related to the companies’ cost of capital, “a measurement of the cost of obtaining debt and equity financing, and it reflects the amount investors would… [read post]
7 Aug 2019, 3:49 pm
Peterman et al., ruling that California’s feed-in tariff for small qualifying facilities (QFs), the Renewable Market Adjusting Tariff (ReMAT), violates the federal Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act (PURPA) (Ninth Circuit Case No. 17-17531). [read post]
7 Aug 2019, 3:49 pm
Peterman et al., ruling that California’s feed-in tariff for small qualifying facilities (QFs), the Renewable Market Adjusting Tariff (ReMAT), violates the federal Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act (PURPA) (Ninth Circuit Case No. 17-17531). [read post]
5 Jun 2019, 1:38 pm
Federal Courts Mozilla Corporation, et al. v. [read post]
25 May 2019, 11:00 am
(David et al. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 12:25 pm
Federal Courts: Mozilla Corporation, et al. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2019, 12:44 pm
See State of Nevada, et al. v. [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 3:50 pm
Penn State Hershey Medical Center et al. at 5. [4] Id. at 13. [5] Id. at 7. [6] Id. at 9. [7] Id. [8] Id. [9] Id. at 10. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 11:21 am
(relisted after the October 26 conference) CTIA-The Wireless Association, et al. v. [read post]
31 Jul 2018, 10:40 am
Generous public pensions, meanwhile, are beginning to catch up with the state, particularly as the population declines. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 2:57 pm
CALPERS: SECURITIES ACT STATUTE OF REPOSE NOT SUBJECT TO EQUITABLE TOLLING In California Public Employees’ Retirement System v. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 12:44 pm
Kern County Board of Supervisors, et al. [read post]
