Search for: "California Supreme Court and Its Judges from 1987 to Present" Results 21 - 40 of 156
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Nov 2008, 3:08 pm
  In both cases, the California Supreme Court upheld the use of these presentations. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 2:26 pm
And in judging that factor, the courts will look at who is appealing from the judgment. [read post]
21 Nov 2018, 7:35 am by Peter Margulies
Moreover, as the Supreme Court explained in 1987 Immigration and Naturalization Service v. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 3:51 pm by Jon Sands
The guarantees of the United States Constitution, as interpreted by the Supreme Court, apply to our most troubled and our most upstanding citizens alike, and our duty as Article III judges to fairly and impartially apply those guarantees to all citizens compels us to rule as we do today.The dissent argues that the California Supreme Court has considered the IAC claim, and its denial was not unreasonable.Congratulations to FPD Sean… [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 7:30 am by W.F. Casey Ebsary, Jr.
  The Judge ruled, "In accordance with Rule 57 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, a Declaratory Judgment shall be entered separately, declaring FLA.STAT. [read post]
Sept. 22, 2021)—that prevented a group of plaintiffs from challenging the approval of a settlement award in a price-fixing case might be on its way to the Supreme Court. [read post]
18 Aug 2016, 8:30 am
  In 1987, Matt joined the ACLU of Northern California as its first gay rights lawyer. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 3:34 pm by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
Rptr. 331 (1988), the case involving whether Ballona Lagoon in Southern California was subject to the state's tidelands trust, that eventually ended up in the Supreme Court. [read post]
23 May 2011, 4:54 am by Tony Mauro
District Court for the Northern District of California spoke of "critical contradictory evidence known to the government and knowingly concealed from the courts. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 5:33 am by Susan Brenner
Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit 1987)). [read post]
9 Jun 2017, 2:56 am by NCC Staff
“In fact, the Supreme Court in the Burger years was in its way as activist as the Court that preceded it, creating new constitutional doctrine in areas like the right to privacy, due process and sexual equality that the Warren Court had only hinted at. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 3:46 pm by Glen C. Hansen
District Courts, how will federal judges handle the disputed state law property questions that will likely be at the heart of many of those claims? [read post]
23 May 2011, 12:00 am
Attorney's Office in Boston, MA; a district court judge from Washington, DC; and a Supervisory U.S. [read post]
17 Mar 2015, 3:07 pm by Kent Scheidegger
  To simply state an overall rate from 1973 to the present is highly misleading.In the early years, the primary reason for reversals was the Supreme Court's inability to agree with itself from one year to the next what the Constitution requires and what it forbids. [read post]
9 Oct 2012, 4:30 am by David J. DePaolo
WCAB (Turner), No. 1997 C.D.2011, is being appealed to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, the question is not really whether fentanyl is proper, reasonable or necessary, but the standard upon which the underlying court made its factual determination. [read post]