Search for: "California v. Flores"
Results 21 - 40
of 173
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Apr 2017, 8:23 pm
The petition of the day is: City of San Gabriel, California v. [read post]
15 May 2017, 8:45 am
Supreme Court denied the City of San Gabriel’s petition for review of Flores v. [read post]
2 May 2024, 1:03 pm
Justice Corrigan authors a powerful opinion that holds that it's not permissible for the police to conduct a Terry stop just because someone's in a high crime area and pretending to tie his shoe behind a car in order to avoid the police, and Justice Evan authors an equally powerful concurrence (joined by a majority of the Court) that highlights the racial implications of a rule that assumes that the "normal" response to a police encounter is to welcome and/or consent to… [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 12:31 pm
Justice Scalia has a well-known opinion (his concurrence in California v. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 4:30 am
Flores v. [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 3:08 pm
”]; Flores v. [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 11:08 am
Even though it's not part of the judgment against him, it's permissible for California to do that.So for the rest of his life, Maciel can't live within a half-mile or so of any school or park. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 9:22 am
This summer, the Ninth Circuit issued its Flores v. [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 9:52 am
According to an account in the New York Times, the case - Flores-Villar v United States - concerns a father seeking to pass his US citizenship on to his foreign-born son. [read post]
24 Sep 2012, 8:08 pm
V. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 8:17 am
Schwarzenegger, the California same-sex marriage case, Gill v. [read post]
12 May 2011, 2:22 pm
On May 10, 2011, the Second Appellate District of California issued a favorable decision for employers in Flores v. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 2:04 pm
I read a lot of the California death penalty cases. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 7:03 pm
The California Court of Appeal (Third Appellate District) issued this unpublished opinion reversing $1.1 million in punitive damages because the plaintiff failed to introduce meaningful evidence of the defendant's financial condition. [read post]
23 May 2011, 9:34 am
Entertainment Merchants Ass’n, No. 08-1448), and Flores-Villar v. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 12:02 pm
An erroneous statement of California law.That's what the Court of Appeal holds today. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 12:16 pm
Flores v. [read post]
20 Aug 2017, 4:54 am
Husman v. [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 11:46 am
In Zuniga v. [read post]
29 Aug 2019, 2:39 pm
Indeed, this is the stance taken in the lawsuit filed by California and other states against the new DHS rule. [read post]
