Search for: "California v. Nichols"
Results 21 - 40
of 93
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Dec 2009, 12:23 pm
See Nichols v. [read post]
17 Jul 2018, 4:21 pm
In Duncan v. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 7:22 am
Briefly: ACSblog posts a panel discussion of AT&T v. [read post]
18 Feb 2008, 1:28 pm
California Coastal Commission to be mostly wrong, after the Supreme Court's 2005 decision in Lingle v. [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 8:33 pm
Nichols, 176 Cal. [read post]
30 May 2019, 5:02 am
" (People v. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 2:00 am
Press, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 4:00 am
In Whren v. [read post]
8 Jan 2021, 4:56 am
McGoarty also argued that he did not have a viable claim until the Supreme Court’s 2016 decision in Nichols v. [read post]
10 Oct 2007, 7:00 pm
In Nichols v City of Taft, the Fifth District Court of Appeal holds that the use of a fee multiplier to compensate for the higher hourly rates of out-of-town counsel requires a sufficient showing -- which the Nichols failed to make -- that hiring local counsel was "impracticable. [read post]
26 Jul 2009, 2:23 pm
Southland Corp. (1985) 168 Cal.App.3d 49, 59; Nichols v. [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 11:23 am
Superior Court; Nichols v. [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 11:23 am
Superior Court; Nichols v. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 4:36 am
The court cited another recent decision, California Dump Truck Owners Association v. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 4:28 pm
Thomas Girardi is an inductee at The Trial Lawyer Hall of Fame who's commonly known for his work in Anderson v. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 8:51 am
Sanders (1964) and Reynolds v. [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 10:32 am
Pennsylvania — constitutional duty of a state supreme court chief justice to recuse from any role in a decision involving a death sentence that the jurist supported during an election campaign Tuesday, March 1: Nichols v. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 3:39 am
Evan Lee previewed the sex-offender-registration case Nichols v. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 6:18 am
This principle was explained most notably by Judge Learned Hand in the 1930 case Nichols v Universal Pictures: It is of course essential to any protection of literary property, whether at common-law or under the statute, that the right cannot be limited literally to the text, else a plagiarist would escape by immaterial variations. [read post]
3 Sep 2011, 8:22 am
S. lived in Los Angeles, California, and attended school while K. [read post]
