Search for: "California v. Sims"
Results 21 - 40
of 141
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Aug 2010, 11:08 pm
Sims, 32 Cal.3d 468, 479 n. 8, 186 Cal.Rptr. 77, 651 P.2d 321 (1982)). [read post]
25 Jan 2015, 8:00 am
LEXIS 6566 (WD WI, Jan. 21, 2015), a Wisconsin federal district court dismissed, with leave to amend, an inmate's complaint that prison authorities refused to recognize the Native American Church as an umbrella religious group.In Sims v. [read post]
1 Mar 2015, 8:35 am
It dismissed claims regarding family events, holy day menus, spiritual advisers, fundraising proceeds, and reporting of plaintiff's marijuana use.In Sims v. [read post]
6 Sep 2007, 6:21 am
After summarizing California law regarding unconscionability and the seminal California Supreme Court decision in Discover Bank v. [read post]
19 May 2022, 3:06 pm
OppFi cites as dispositive two federal district court decisions in which the courts rejected the plaintiffs’ usury claims that were based on “true lender” theories, including a 2021 case involving OppFi, Sims v. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 1:06 pm
Law Offices of Winn and Sims, No. 06-cv-00599, 2021 WL 9917688, at *2 (S.D. [read post]
22 Apr 2018, 7:00 am
LEXIS 28959, Feb. 22, 2018), allowed an inmate to move ahead with retaliation, free exercise and California Bane Act claims complaining that a correctional officer poured bleach on his legal papers and his prayer rug.In Sims v. [read post]
25 May 2012, 1:12 pm
See Tidewater Marine Western, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 9:00 pm
Electronic Arts v. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 1:03 am
Sims (377 U.S. 533, 1964), and Miranda v. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 2:39 pm
" (California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation v. [read post]
21 Mar 2010, 12:50 pm
Sims, 2010 U.S. [read post]
4 Apr 2015, 10:53 am
Morgan Big Problems in California’s New Law Restricting Employers’ Access to Employees’ Online Accounts (Forbes Cross-Post) Fight Over Access to Log-in Credentials for Blog Does not Trigger Copyright Preemption – Insynq v. [read post]
5 Aug 2022, 8:50 am
–Sims v. [read post]
20 Dec 2016, 8:28 am
California, 380 U.S. 609 (1965) Reynolds v. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 10:31 am
Sims); and holding that the Constitution requires the states to provide defense attorneys to criminal defendants charged with serious offenses (Gideon v. [read post]
25 Sep 2016, 4:53 pm
LEXIS 127018 (MD PA, Sept. 19, 2016), a Pennsylvania federal district court held that where an inmate refused to provide a written indication of his religious preference, prison officials could not be found to have substantially burdened the exercise of his unknown belief.In Sims v. [read post]
14 Dec 2018, 5:22 pm
The case is Sims v. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 4:36 pm
The case is Mitchell Sims vs California Department of Corrections Rehabilitation, et al, case number CIV 1004019. [read post]
