Search for: "California v. Stout"
Results 21 - 28
of 28
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jun 2010, 6:15 am
[v.] [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 3:55 am
No party, however, explains why California law should apply to this question. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 10:57 am
” Click Here Unilever Fined for Polluting California Air With Deodorant Spray. [read post]
20 Aug 2009, 8:12 am
Department of Health and Human Services1961 Stout Street -- Room 1426 FOBDenver, CO 80294-3538Voice Phone (303)844-2024FAX (303)844-2025TDD (303)844-3439Region IX - San Francisco (American Samoa, Arizona, California, Guam, Hawaii, Nevada)Michael Kruley, Regional ManagerOffice for Civil RightsU.S. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 11:52 am
California Appellate Districts, April 16, 2009 World Fin. [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 3:24 am
The Michigan offense was dismal, although Utah is known for its stout defense. [read post]
6 Jun 2008, 6:49 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: YouTube – Prince demands removal of song from YouTube, Radiohead demand it is put back online: (Techdirt), (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (The Trademark Blog), Japan planning fair use provision: (Michael Geist), (Techdirt), (IP Justice), (Patry Copyright Blog), Judge rejects Yoko Ono’s request for preliminary injunction… [read post]
18 Jun 2007, 1:50 pm
At Reuters, James Vicini has this article on the decision, "a defeat for California officials"; David Stout reports here in the New York Times; McClatchy's Michael Doyle has this story discussing the ruling, which affirms passengers' constitutional rights to search-and-seizure protections; at Volokh Conspiracy, Orin Kerr weighs in here on the Brendlin decision, stating "Justice Souter's opinion gets it right". [read post]
