Search for: "Callaway Golf Company"
Results 21 - 40
of 42
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Mar 2011, 8:33 am
Acushnet Last May we reported the possibility of a conflict between the PTO and the District Court in the golf ball patent dispute, Callaway v. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 12:33 pm
Acushnet is the parent company of Titleist, maker of the ProV1 family of golf balls. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 3:10 am
Acushnet is the parent company of Titleist, maker of the ProV1 family of golf balls. [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 8:19 pm
For the historical minded, it is not the year that Britain was last invaded (1066), but rather the number of golf balls listed on the United States Golf Association’s List of Conforming Golf Balls. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 5:00 am
He also serves on the boards of Callaway Golf Company, Del Monte Foods Company, Exponent, Inc., and Franklin Resources, Inc. [read post]
26 Jun 2010, 5:37 am
Meditation Course: Simple and Beneficial Course for Children | Health Monday's Tribe lineup Choosing Your Tribe | Mums The Blog APP: Lakewood BOE blasted in state audit for routine overspending … Leaving the Tribe | Chinese kung fu fans The Callaway Golf Club | Golfing Tips Golf Tips- 5 Basic Golf Swing Tips To Fine Tune Your Game … Seneca Nation Casinos come under IRS Audit is a post from: IRS Tax Problem Solver Blog - IRS Help [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 11:56 am
Here’s a few recent disclosures that caught our attention: Taking a mulligan — You can’t blame Callaway Golf Co. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 10:42 am
After four long years, the parent company of Titleist scored a big win Monday in its long-running patent dispute with Callaway over the Pro V1 golf ball when a jury threw out Callaway's claim for $246 million in damages. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 9:45 am
Callaway Golf Company v. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 9:29 am
" Callaway Golf Company v. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 5:24 am
(Business IP and Intangible Asset Report and Blog) Global - Patents New exchange, Intellectual Property Exchange International, can be a game-changer, but will need good patents to thrive (IAM) (Technology Transfer Tactics) Australia Bittersweet decision for Mars but Cadbury settles purple dispute: Mars Australia Pty Ltd v Sweet Rewards Pty Ltd (Managing IP) (ipwars) Belgium Belgian Supreme Court prohibits fishing expeditions: Ineos Manufacturing Belgium NV and Ineos Services… [read post]
29 Sep 2009, 3:00 am
Golf equipment e. [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 7:01 am
(IP finance) Global - Patents Access to Research for Development and Innovation scheme gives Patent Offices in developing countries free or low-cost access to 150 online scientific journals (Patenting Lives) (Spicy IP) IP strategies for high growth companies (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) Is IP causing global warming? [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 12:57 pm
Acushnet had argued that patents for the golf balls, owned by Callaway Golf Company, were invalid due to patent doctrines known as "obviousness" and "anticipation. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 3:00 am
(Spicy IP) Italy Milan Court clarifies validity requirements of registered Community designs (Class 46) Poland Procedural problems – JAZZ JAMBOREE registration (Class 46) Tricky representative – SCOTCH & SODA trade mark dispute (Class 46) South Africa Report on South African Copyright Act – Shuttleworth Foundation (Afro-IP) United Kingdom EWHC (Pat): When do you sue a holding company? [read post]
14 Aug 2009, 1:02 pm
Originally, Callaway Golf Company brought suit against [...] [read post]
14 Aug 2009, 11:21 am
In March of this year, Callaway sued the company again, alleging that the infringement had continued. [read post]
12 Jul 2009, 8:00 am
However, the way in which companies are able to target and control their message through placement is becoming increasingly sophisticated. [read post]
10 Jun 2009, 6:33 am
See Callaway Golf Co. v. [read post]
25 Dec 2008, 2:52 am
"Although more carefully guarded, the Acushnet Company (Titleist, FootJoy, Cobra) basically is telling Callaway Golf Company the same thing in the companies' ongoing legal battle regarding golf ball patents.After a three judge panel of the U.S. [read post]
