Search for: "Campaign for Quality Education v. State of California"
Results 21 - 40
of 62
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Dec 2018, 3:03 am
Following the long-lasting dispute against Grenade Beverage, the California federal court awarded the cat’s owner the sum of $710,001 for the copyright and trade mark infringement. [read post]
14 Jul 2018, 6:42 am
The latest opinion in an apparent decade-long online trolling campaign. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 5:06 am
” At American Thinker, Deborah La Fetra maintains that the “Gift Clause[s]” in state constitutions would prevent states from enacting “workarounds” to the court’s recent decision in Janus v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 10:25 am
He spent $3M getting the initiative qualified for the ballot and funding a support campaign. [read post]
26 Dec 2017, 9:30 pm
According to his campaign we [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 1:30 am
Heather McCabe, Indiana University School of Social Work, Reviewing the Reviews: What are they learning through interprofessional education? [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 2:00 pm
”[28] V. [read post]
7 Oct 2016, 2:40 pm
Lin, Professor of Law, University of California, Davis, School of Law—Community Levers for Benefit Sharing James N. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 8:58 pm
In Campaign for Quality Education v. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 10:21 am
The Handbook sets a new standard of quality in the field by offering a world-wide forum of discussion in cliometrics. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am
The court found that the piece in question, a review of anti-counterfeit regulations, “possesses a creative quality, epitomised by originality and novelty” because the work was "“the result of a personal, original, new and creative elaboration of legal concepts and industry practices and of the experiences of the author”. [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 2:03 pm
Metaphysics: Toney v. [read post]
25 Aug 2015, 7:15 am
Detroit Board of Education. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 5:26 pm
In 1913, California was one of the first States to prohibit the sale and possession of marijuana, and at the end of the century, California became the first State to authorize limited use of the drug for medicinal purposes. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 5:30 am
Cohen v. [read post]
10 Jan 2014, 4:10 pm
While Davidon Homes v. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 10:34 am
Hyder v. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 1:45 am
Last year, the 9th Circuit decided in UMG v. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 6:13 am
Petitioners’ reply United States Steel Corp. v. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 1:23 pm
District Court for the Northern District of California (the “Court”) will decide in Apple Inc. v. [read post]
