Search for: "Card+ v. US" Results 21 - 40 of 6,703
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Sep 2012, 6:30 pm by BuckleySandler
The cardholder applied for a credit card that offered rewards for purchases, to be used at the retailer’s stores. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 10:40 am by Michael Oykhman
Use A key consideration when establishing “use” of a credit card is established in a case called R v Tuduce, 2014 ONCA 547 (CanLII). [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 3:05 pm by Law Offices of J Craig Fong
Finally, and most unpredictably, the Supreme Court of the United States will be deciding the case of US v. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 5:28 am
In finding that the ATM card was neither a credit card or debit card as defined by the law and, as a result, the defendant's use and possession was not a felony, the court found that: "Although the definition of credit card in the General Business Law would appear to be clear and unequivocal, making resort to extrinsic matter inappropriate ( see, Sega v. [read post]
27 Nov 2010, 4:35 pm by jefhenninger
Many small credit card fraud cases usually involve one person stealing a credit card or using one that they find on the floor. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 8:14 am
The Topps Company (“Topps”) is suing fellow baseball trading card manufacturer Leaf Trading Cards (“Leaf”) for copyright and trademark infringement in a lawsuit recently filed in federal court (The Topps Company, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 4:01 am by Ronald Mann
I think that neither the merchants nor the card networks will be jubilant about the Supreme Court’s narrow decision yesterday in Expressions Hair Design v. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 10:42 am by Erik Slobe
The US Supreme Court [official website] ruled [opinion, PDF] Wednesday in Expressions Hair Design v. [read post]
24 Nov 2009, 6:00 am by randal shaheen
The holidays are approaching, and once again gift card season is upon us. [read post]
22 Nov 2016, 3:17 am by Ben
Lord Justice Floyd did not agree with Luxton that the proceedings were an illicit attempt by FAPL to prevent the use of foreign decoders cards as they were entitled to prevent a domestic card from being used for commercial purposes (nothing to show FAPL would only enforce if foreign domestic). [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 6:35 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The credit card companies charge a fee for the use of the cards, so merchants want to encourage customers to use cash. [read post]
21 Aug 2010, 9:05 pm by David Jacobson
The Guide also discusses the unsolicited issue of companion cards, the issue of replacement cards for cards that were never used and when it will consider no action letters. [read post]
Becerra, the Ninth Circuit found unconstitutional a California law barring retailers from imposing surcharges on customers using credit cards. [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 1:29 pm by Barbara S. Mishkin
The complaint also alleges that the company used consumer reports in violation of the Fair Credit Reporting Act and Regulation V. [read post]