Search for: "Cargo Carriers, Inc."
Results 21 - 40
of 111
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Mar 2020, 4:31 am
The bonds were secured by 50.1 per cent of the share capital of Citgo Holding Inc., a subsidiary of PDVSA. [read post]
15 Aug 2019, 10:36 am
Lan Cargo SA (Fla. 3rd DCA 2013), the appellant’s civil action against two statutory employers was barred based on election of remedy. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 5:01 am
Allied International, Inc., 456 U.S. 212 (1982), where union members engaged in a purely politically motivated boycott of cargoes shipped from the USSR (engaged in as a protest of the invasion of Afghanistan). [read post]
10 May 2019, 1:19 pm
Inc. v. [read post]
20 Aug 2018, 6:57 am
Dera served particulars of their cargo claim in June 2015. [read post]
15 May 2018, 5:15 am
Since Simon was “cargo” for purposes of the Convention, and the Convention limits liability for cargo damage to 17 “SDRs” (currently about $1.43 each) per kilogram, then 17 times $1.43 x 10 kilograms of rabbit=a maximum of $243.10 for the death of Simon. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 2:47 pm
Global Oil Tools, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Jan 2018, 12:10 pm
Freightplus (USA), Inc., 120 F. [read post]
11 Aug 2017, 1:47 pm
Marine Terminals, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Aug 2017, 1:47 pm
Marine Terminals, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Aug 2017, 1:47 pm
Marine Terminals, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 8:34 pm
American Airlines, Inc. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 7:36 am
Border Transfer of MA, Inc., January 5, 2017, Saris, P.). [read post]
27 Oct 2016, 11:10 pm
Golden Hawk Metallurgical, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Oct 2016, 11:10 am
Cool Cargo Carriers, Inc., 936 So. 2d 646 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006) (concluding that rear-end collision presumption did not apply because there was conflicting testimony related to whether the leading vehicle suddenly changed lanes and was traveling at a low rate of speed). [read post]
19 Oct 2016, 11:10 am
Cool Cargo Carriers, Inc., 936 So. 2d 646 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006) (concluding that rear-end collision presumption did not apply because there was conflicting testimony related to whether the leading vehicle suddenly changed lanes and was traveling at a low rate of speed). [read post]
19 Sep 2016, 5:00 am
Couglar and Cargo Transporters, Inc., No. 3:16-cv-665 (M.D. [read post]
31 May 2016, 10:12 am
However, in certain narrow circumstances, it is possible that platform workers whose regular assigned duties include the loading/unloading of cargo from vessels will be covered directly under the act. [6] Benefits Owed Under the LHWCA: The LHWCA sets forth benefits that are statutorily defined to generally be 66.66% of the average weekly wage, which is based up on the preceding 52 weeks prior to the injury producing event. [read post]
31 May 2016, 10:12 am
However, in certain narrow circumstances, it is possible that platform workers whose regular assigned duties include the loading/unloading of cargo from vessels will be covered directly under the act. [6] Benefits Owed Under the LHWCA: The LHWCA sets forth benefits that are statutorily defined to generally be 66.66% of the average weekly wage, which is based up on the preceding 52 weeks prior to the injury producing event. [read post]
23 May 2016, 4:26 am
Two questions were certified for immediate appeal to the Illinois Appellate Court in a case against a school bus company, First Student Inc. [read post]
