Search for: "Carl Oppedahl" Results 21 - 38 of 38
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Dec 2023, 5:53 am
Carl Oppedahl, at his Ant-Like Persistence blog, has the transcript of the argument here. [read post]
23 May 2018, 3:37 pm by Steve Baird
Eric Pelton Lead, with Backup Vocals by Carl Oppedahl? [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 6:22 am by John L. Welch
"Lara notes that Carl Oppedahl of Oppedahl Patent Law Firm (“OPLF”) has expanded his firm’s E-Trademarks List to replace TM Topics:As the sponsor of the E-Trademarks-L listserv, we at OPLF are broadening the charter of the listserv to embrace the areas previously served by the TMTopics listserv. [read post]
12 Sep 2007, 11:13 pm
Earlier this year, Patents.com was sold by patent attorney Carl Oppedahl for “an undisclosed amount reportedly between $1 to $2 million. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 1:35 am by John L. Welch
" This is good news for the many trademark practitioners who rely on Carl Oppedahl's fabulous (and free) "Feathers! [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 11:38 am
Thanks to Carl Oppedahl of the Oppedahl Patent Law Firm LLC for the practice tip. [read post]
24 May 2010, 8:00 am
I first heard about this on Carl Oppedahl's excellent EFS listserv. [read post]
19 Dec 2014, 2:59 am
The USPTO also reduces by $50 the fee for a TEAS Plus application from $275 to $225 per class and reduces by $100 the fee for a TEAS application for renewal of a registration from $400 to $300 per class.Carl OppedahlAt his blog, Ant-like Persistence - a name only a patent attorney could love - Carl Oppedahl suggests (here) that, when possible, one might delay filing a renewal application until after January 15th in order to save a few bucks. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 6:07 am
Carl Oppedahl, an experienced practitioner who has studied the new rules extensively, says "it is not much of an exaggeration to say that they change everything about the Oath and Declaration of the inventor. [read post]
3 Dec 2007, 2:15 am
"The USPTO has indeed moved TDR over to its own server that is not vulnerable to high usage of PAIR," notes electronic filing guru Carl Oppedahl on his TARR Listserv. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 7:58 am
It doesn't seem to have a name -- but the author is the respected and well-regarded Colorado-based Carl Oppedahl, so it should be good!" [read post]
17 Feb 2024, 2:17 pm by Erik J. Heels
For more on the DOCX debacle, see the “Non-DOCX Penalty” category on Carl Oppedahl’s “Ant-Like Persistence” blog (https://blog.oppedahl.com/category/patents/non-docx-penalty/). [read post]
13 Oct 2006, 5:00 pm
Sampson IP Analytics, Caterpillar, Inc, Peoria, IllinoisElectronic Patent Office (US e-filing PCT-SAFE, EPO e-filing) by Carl Oppedahl - Oppedahl and Olson LLP, Dillon, ColoradoBest practices: Patent Management Boards for Invention Screening, annuity decisions - A CPS Roundtable Discussion led by Dean Olson (Moderator) - Senior Corporate Counsel, Pfizer, Inc., Groton, ConnecticutDesign Patents, Trade Dress, EU Community Design Utility models - Compare & Contrast by… [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 3:46 am by Dennis Crouch
The U.S. application was prosecuted by Carl Oppedahl's Colorado-based firm. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 6:24 pm by Dennis Crouch
Carl Oppedahl has been writing about the impact of the new .DOCX standard associated with a $400 fee for non-compliance as a typical procedural rule with substantive impact created without notice-and-comment because it merely involves procedural aspects of the patent application process — despite the large penalty for noncompliance. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 1:44 am by Kelly
Here is Think IP Strategy’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
7 May 2012, 9:41 am by Lara
As the ever-so-wise Daniel Kegan pointed out to me on Carl Oppedahl’s invaluable e-trademarks listserv, this is not the first time Congress granted exclusive trademark rights. [read post]
5 Feb 2018, 12:17 pm by Erik J. Heels
But I could not imagine resorting to using this tool, which can possibly give away your secret sauce, and could also be a violation of the attorney-client privilege: * Automated Analysis of 101 Eligibility (2017-10-20)https://patentlyo.com/hricik/2017/10/automated-analysis-eligibility.html * Carl Oppedahl Asks: Is someone tampering with your US trademark registrations? [read post]