Search for: "Carlile v. State" Results 21 - 40 of 47
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jul 2014, 1:37 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
R (Lord Carlile of Berriew QC & Ors) v SSHD, heard 13 May 2014. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 2:00 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
R (Lord Carlile of Berriew QC & Ors) v SSHD, heard 13 May 2014. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 7:53 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
R (Lord Carlile of Berriew QC & Ors) v SSHD, heard 13 May 2014. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 7:32 am by Jocelyn Hutton
R (Lord Carlile of Berriew QC & Ors) v SSHD, heard 13 May 2014. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 2:44 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
R (Lord Carlile of Berriew QC & Ors) v SSHD, heard 13 May 2014. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 1:58 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
R (Lord Carlile of Berriew QC & Ors) v SSHD, heard 13 May 2014. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 4:00 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
R (Lord Carlile of Berriew QC & Ors) v SSHD, heard 13 May 2014. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 1:42 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
R (Lord Carlile of Berriew QC & Ors) v SSHD, heard 13 May 2014. [read post]
27 May 2014, 7:22 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
R (Lord Carlile of Berriew QC & Ors) v SSHD, heard 13 May 2014. [read post]
19 May 2014, 1:42 am by Jocelyn Hutton
R (Lord Carlile of Berriew QC & Ors) v SSHD, heard 13 May 2014. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 11:28 am by Rosalind English
Lord Carlile and others v Secretary of State for the Home Department – read judgment The High Court has upheld an order by the Home Secretary preventing Maryam Rajavi, a prominent Iranian dissident, from speaking in Parliament. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 12:07 am by INFORRM
In R (Lord Carlile of Berriew CBE QC and others) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWHC 617 (Admin), the Divisional Court upheld, with evident reluctance, the Home Secretary’s decision to exclude Maryam Rajavi, “an eminent dissident Iranian politician”, from the UK – denying her the opportunity from meeting in the Palace of Westminster with 16 prominent cross-party members of the House of Lords and the House of Commons to discuss… [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 5:42 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) R. v SVS Solicitors [2012] EWCA Crim 319 (15 February 2012) A v B & Anor [2012] EWCA Civ 285 (14 March 2012) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Maqsood v Mahmood & Anor [2012] EWCA Civ 251 (13 March 2012) JD (Congo) & Ors v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWCA Civ 327 (16 March 2012) Barr & Ors v Biffa Waste Services Ltd [2012] EWCA Civ 312 (19 March 2012) High Court… [read post]
18 Mar 2012, 2:10 pm by Sam Murrant
A post on the Freemovement blog on the recent case of Lamichhane v Secretary of State for the Home Department states that just that may be happening in a subset of immigration cases. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 2:50 am by Adam Wagner
Sign up to free human rights updates by email, Facebook, Twitter or RSS Related posts Secret evidence v open justice: the current state of play Does “bringing rights home” mean bringing problems home too? [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 3:01 am by GuestPost
  In fact, it was not until the report published in 2010 that Carlile explicitly stated that section 44 in its present form should not continue in operation (Carlile Report on 2009, para 268). [read post]